I found the pro-abortion slant of the panel’s discussion disturbing. They state that most voters want abortion to be highly restricted after the first trimester. The mid-point is probably something near or just after the heartbeat being detectable, which Stacy Abrams laughably says is a lie concocted by the patriarchy.
I found the pro-abortion slant of the panel’s discussion disturbing. They state that most voters want abortion to be highly restricted after the first trimester. The mid-point is probably something near or just after the heartbeat being detectable, which Stacy Abrams laughably says is a lie concocted by the patriarchy.
They are correct in noting that high-up Democrats thought it would be a winning issue but the issue is not pulling in votes, apparently.
The panel is also correct in stating that in blue states nothing has changed substantially in a mother’s ability to sacrifice her child for her preferred life course.
The panel seemed surprised that in states like Michigan, where the legislature is considering restrictions on abortion, there is not a wave of pro-Democrat enthusiasm.
Perhaps it is because many if not most voters in the state want those restrictions. Maybe the elected representatives represent their constituencies.
I think the volume of objection to restrictions, highly amplified in legacy media and social media, is not representative of how most people feel. I think the panel just doesn’t get that.
"I think the volume of objection to restrictions, highly amplified in legacy media and social media, is not representative of how most people feel."
Ding ding ding. This is true for almost everything. What the media tells you that "this is what most Americans believe in" is a LIE. You just pointed out one of the biggest ones.
I found the pro-abortion slant of the panel’s discussion disturbing. They state that most voters want abortion to be highly restricted after the first trimester. The mid-point is probably something near or just after the heartbeat being detectable, which Stacy Abrams laughably says is a lie concocted by the patriarchy.
They are correct in noting that high-up Democrats thought it would be a winning issue but the issue is not pulling in votes, apparently.
The panel is also correct in stating that in blue states nothing has changed substantially in a mother’s ability to sacrifice her child for her preferred life course.
The panel seemed surprised that in states like Michigan, where the legislature is considering restrictions on abortion, there is not a wave of pro-Democrat enthusiasm.
Perhaps it is because many if not most voters in the state want those restrictions. Maybe the elected representatives represent their constituencies.
I think the volume of objection to restrictions, highly amplified in legacy media and social media, is not representative of how most people feel. I think the panel just doesn’t get that.
"I think the volume of objection to restrictions, highly amplified in legacy media and social media, is not representative of how most people feel."
Ding ding ding. This is true for almost everything. What the media tells you that "this is what most Americans believe in" is a LIE. You just pointed out one of the biggest ones.