'I think Trump was probably hoping it would dominate the headlines. Yet the headlines really were very much about the debate.' You guys are still hooked on the relevance of legacy media headlines. Most people (except the older generation that still have a cable subscription and believe what they hear on the magic box) don't care what the…
'I think Trump was probably hoping it would dominate the headlines. Yet the headlines really were very much about the debate.' You guys are still hooked on the relevance of legacy media headlines. Most people (except the older generation that still have a cable subscription and believe what they hear on the magic box) don't care what the headlines say. 'It's all bullshit' is the attitude. Look at the difference in reach between Trump and Tucker's interview and the debate. 15 million to 200+ million ish? Your framework for analysis has been superceded.
That was 200M+ *impressions* on Twitter timeline. The same tweet can appear multiple times on the same timeline (the Tucker interview appeared at least 5 times on mine), and an imporession doesn't mean someone watched it, just that it was seen. We can't know how many people actually *watched* more than 5 seconds of the Tucker interview; I'd wager around 20 million.
There are only like 260M active Twitter (er, X users). And only 333M people in the USA. The number that appears below the tweet looks exciting, but it's not really representative of anything except that it got retweeted a lot.
TBH, it was really boring anyways. Apparently, Trump believes Epstien killed himself and is *really* into mosquito nets in Panama. In particular, Tucker completely avoided any questions about the jab/lockdowns, or the Ukraine war.
You could be right. I think it doesn’t matter who’s the R nominee except the ones that support never ending wars (Nikki, Pence …). I guess Vivek, Ronnie are out.
“Newly declassified US intel claims Russia is laundering propaganda through unwitting Westerners | CNN Politics”
'I think Trump was probably hoping it would dominate the headlines. Yet the headlines really were very much about the debate.' You guys are still hooked on the relevance of legacy media headlines. Most people (except the older generation that still have a cable subscription and believe what they hear on the magic box) don't care what the headlines say. 'It's all bullshit' is the attitude. Look at the difference in reach between Trump and Tucker's interview and the debate. 15 million to 200+ million ish? Your framework for analysis has been superceded.
That was 200M+ *impressions* on Twitter timeline. The same tweet can appear multiple times on the same timeline (the Tucker interview appeared at least 5 times on mine), and an imporession doesn't mean someone watched it, just that it was seen. We can't know how many people actually *watched* more than 5 seconds of the Tucker interview; I'd wager around 20 million.
There are only like 260M active Twitter (er, X users). And only 333M people in the USA. The number that appears below the tweet looks exciting, but it's not really representative of anything except that it got retweeted a lot.
TBH, it was really boring anyways. Apparently, Trump believes Epstien killed himself and is *really* into mosquito nets in Panama. In particular, Tucker completely avoided any questions about the jab/lockdowns, or the Ukraine war.
The debate had 12M viewers. 2015 had 24M.
And now add the elephant’s mug shot and how it backfired.
It didn’t backfire. The Democrats prefer Trump to be the R nominee. It gives them a certain victory.
Yup
Democrats are doing everything they can to make Trump the R nominee. Especially CNN, MSNBC and liberal news media. They need Trump for ratings.
Correct.
The Dems have put this through their white board and that’s their plan.
All you will see or hear is the Trump mug shot.
Argument closed.
You could be right. I think it doesn’t matter who’s the R nominee except the ones that support never ending wars (Nikki, Pence …). I guess Vivek, Ronnie are out.
“Newly declassified US intel claims Russia is laundering propaganda through unwitting Westerners | CNN Politics”
Supporting Ukraine in its inevitable defeat of Russia is supporting an end to Russia’s never ending wars.