A recent opinion article by Zeynep Tufekci in the controversial New York Times offered a much more subtle analysis of the Cochrane Library article. Not surprisingly, the science is less clear and the review article by Cochrane does not offer the definitive, black and white “masks make no difference” reported in the FP and elsewhere. Beca…
A recent opinion article by Zeynep Tufekci in the controversial New York Times offered a much more subtle analysis of the Cochrane Library article. Not surprisingly, the science is less clear and the review article by Cochrane does not offer the definitive, black and white “masks make no difference” reported in the FP and elsewhere. Because the issue is so politically charged. I wish the FP would revisit this topic and report in a more nuanced fashion. I guess it’s not news to say “we don’t really know!”
A recent opinion article by Zeynep Tufekci in the controversial New York Times offered a much more subtle analysis of the Cochrane Library article. Not surprisingly, the science is less clear and the review article by Cochrane does not offer the definitive, black and white “masks make no difference” reported in the FP and elsewhere. Because the issue is so politically charged. I wish the FP would revisit this topic and report in a more nuanced fashion. I guess it’s not news to say “we don’t really know!”
Yes I would like FP to cover this latest clarification: Misinterpretation, political pressure, nuanced... a little of everything?
I can’t find a way to email anybody on the editorial side to share this. For example, letter to editor or something like that? Can you?