The Free Press
Shop Our New Merch!
NewslettersSign InSubscribe
The Real Problem with the Shadow Docket
The “shadow docket” isn’t evidence that the Supreme Court is partisan, writes Jeb Rubenfeld, but its decisions’ general lack of explanation is troubling. (Illustration by The Free Press)
Emergency Supreme Court orders are not an example of a partisan court, as some critics have claimed. But because they are an act of power, not law, they damage the court’s legitimacy nevertheless.
By Jed Rubenfeld
04.20.26 — U.S. Politics
--:--
--:--
Upgrade to Listen
5 mins
Produced by ElevenLabs using AI narration
18
24

Occasionally, parties ask the Supreme Court to immediately reverse or stay a lower court’s decision without full briefing or oral argument, hoping to skip over potentially years of litigation—and sometimes skipping over the appellate courts entirely. When I was a young lawyer, most appeals of this kind were considered almost frivolous, because the Court so rarely granted them. Today they are much more common, and they have a new name: the “emergency docket” or, more darkly, the “shadow docket.”

On Saturday, The New York Times published 10-year-old leaked emails and memos the justices wrote one another before issuing what many now regard as the pathbreaking ruling that gave birth to the modern shadow docket—a 2016 one-paragraph order that stayed President Barack Obama’s attempt to force power companies away from fossil fuels, something he did without congressional approval.

Start Your Free Trial to Unlock This Story
Support our journalism and unlock all of our investigative stories and provocative commentary about the world as it actually is. Get your first 7 days free.
Annual
$8.33/month
Billed as $100 yearly
Save $20!
Monthly
$10/month
Billed as $10 monthly
Already have an account?
Sign In
To read this article, sign in or start your free trial
Jed Rubenfeld
Jed Rubenfeld is a professor of constitutional law at Yale Law School, a free speech lawyer, and host of the Straight Down the Middle podcast. He is the author of five books, including the million-copy bestselling novel The Interpretation of Murder, and his work has been translated into over thirty languages. He lives with his wife, Amy Chua, in New York City, and is the proud father of two exceptional daughters, Sophia and Lulu.
Tags:
Supreme Court
Law
Comments
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

No posts

For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersShopPodcastsVideoEvents
Download the app
Download on the Google Play Store
©2026 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice