The terms "bad" and "good" are meaningless without explanation, "bad for whom" and "good for whom"; "a dagger is good for one, who has it, and bad for on, who doesn't have it".
It is good if the people is able for one, who intended to be a leader of these people; it is bad if the folks are able for one, who intended to have these folks as subordinates.
The terms "bad" and "good" are meaningless without explanation, "bad for whom" and "good for whom"; "a dagger is good for one, who has it, and bad for on, who doesn't have it".
It is good if the people is able for one, who intended to be a leader of these people; it is bad if the folks are able for one, who intended to have these folks as subordinates.
The terms "bad" and "good" are meaningless without explanation, "bad for whom" and "good for whom"; "a dagger is good for one, who has it, and bad for on, who doesn't have it".
It is good if the people is able for one, who intended to be a leader of these people; it is bad if the folks are able for one, who intended to have these folks as subordinates.