Commenting has been turned off for this post
Richard E Stoner's avatar

Employers in general require a degree of discretion in determining whether an employee is acting in a fashion that discredits their organization. Not absolute discretion, to be sure-- however, I believe the University of Wisconsin is acting within its rights to terminate Mr. Gow's employment, granting that reasonable people could disagree.

Many persons (like Mr. Gow) are mistaken in asserting that 1A freedom of speech rights require employers to tolerate any and all behavioral or rhetorical excess. 1A restrains the Government, not society at large and all organizations therein. Mr. Gow would have strong basis for complaint were he legally prosecuted for his extracurricular frolics. That's not the issue here.

Expand full comment
BTirado's avatar

I believe the panel did not recommend. He lose his tenure for making porn with his wife. I’m pretty sure the panel recommended he lose tenure for posting online such videos for his potential students to see.

Expand full comment
25 more comments...

No posts