Well my first impression was this was an incredibly convincing narrative of what was happening behind the scenes in MSM and NYT 2016 onward. The manner in which it was described was totally convincing to me and presented almost matter of factly but without a hint of personal malice. That must have been hard. My second impression was that…
Well my first impression was this was an incredibly convincing narrative of what was happening behind the scenes in MSM and NYT 2016 onward. The manner in which it was described was totally convincing to me and presented almost matter of factly but without a hint of personal malice. That must have been hard. My second impression was that the manifest gaslighting perused by many reporters and media outlets was far, far more egregious than I had assumed. It was worse than I had thought and that was a scary revelation. Entire events were deemed unimportant or dangerously helpful to the ‘opposition’ and thus totally ignored. It didn’t matter what there relevance was for victims of outrageous public disorder.
Well my first impression was this was an incredibly convincing narrative of what was happening behind the scenes in MSM and NYT 2016 onward. The manner in which it was described was totally convincing to me and presented almost matter of factly but without a hint of personal malice. That must have been hard. My second impression was that the manifest gaslighting perused by many reporters and media outlets was far, far more egregious than I had assumed. It was worse than I had thought and that was a scary revelation. Entire events were deemed unimportant or dangerously helpful to the ‘opposition’ and thus totally ignored. It didn’t matter what there relevance was for victims of outrageous public disorder.