Welcome interns! As to the critics, let's not make the mistake of putting identity before substance. Isn't rejection of that approach one of the reasons we love Free Press? Let's see what these people can do!
Welcome interns! As to the critics, let's not make the mistake of putting identity before substance. Isn't rejection of that approach one of the reasons we love Free Press? Let's see what these people can do!
The decision focused on race and both the Civil Rights Act and Equal Protection clause. Geographic diversity hasn't been applied to either to the best of my knowledge.
Yes. And I agree...quotas of any kind are dumb and lazy. Getting the best candidates for a job or institution is hard work. If you're serious about it.
Welcome interns! As to the critics, let's not make the mistake of putting identity before substance. Isn't rejection of that approach one of the reasons we love Free Press? Let's see what these people can do!
Agreed, checking a box for тАЬregional diversityтАЭ is as dumb as it sounds
Yes, and ironic considering the SCOTUS ruling on Affirmative Action.тАЭ
I doubt a quest for regional diversity would transgress the Students for Fair Admissions decision.
The merit argument? Quotas (in effect)?
The decision focused on race and both the Civil Rights Act and Equal Protection clause. Geographic diversity hasn't been applied to either to the best of my knowledge.
Point taken. But do you see the parallel?
Yes. And I agree...quotas of any kind are dumb and lazy. Getting the best candidates for a job or institution is hard work. If you're serious about it.