How many times does Every. Single. Article on the Oct 7th attack have to lead with the excruciating details involving the torment of infants? Could we just assume that WE KNOW what happened and don't need to go through the horror of it every time someone wants to write a think piece?
How many times does Every. Single. Article on the Oct 7th attack have to lead with the excruciating details involving the torment of infants? Could we just assume that WE KNOW what happened and don't need to go through the horror of it every time someone wants to write a think piece?
Because it's all about the spin. Go into graphic detail of the atrocities committed by one side to show them as evil then just casually mention, or not, the greater atrocities committed by the other side as "defending itself" or "just response" or some other bullshit like that to show them as the saviors.
How many times does Every. Single. Article on the Oct 7th attack have to lead with the excruciating details involving the torment of infants? Could we just assume that WE KNOW what happened and don't need to go through the horror of it every time someone wants to write a think piece?
Because it's all about the spin. Go into graphic detail of the atrocities committed by one side to show them as evil then just casually mention, or not, the greater atrocities committed by the other side as "defending itself" or "just response" or some other bullshit like that to show them as the saviors.