The Free Press
NewslettersSign InSubscribe

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
Martin Gurri: Trump Has a Mandate to Lead. What Comes Next?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Martin Gurri: Trump Has a Mandate to Lead. What Comes Next?
Trump supporters attend a campaign rally on November 1, 2024 in Warren, Michigan. (Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images)
During his first term of office, Trump’s energies were concentrated on negation. This time around, all thoughts are turned to action.
By Martin Gurri
01.19.25 — U.S. Politics
178
302

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
Martin Gurri: Trump Has a Mandate to Lead. What Comes Next?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

One year before Donald Trump even declared his first White House run, Martin Gurri predicted the rise of populism with his seminal book, The Revolt of the Public. The former CIA analyst also foresaw Brexit, BLM, and MAGA before those movements were in the national consciousness. Now, a decade after Martin’s book came out, we are ushering in a second Trump term. In his latest column for The Free Press, reprinted from Discourse, Martin imagines what the next four years will look like now that the public has revolted—and their candidate has a true mandate to lead. —The Editors

There is a radical dissatisfaction with the social and political status quo across the democratic world. The people in charge are distrusted and despised by the public: They are thought to be in business for themselves and indifferent to the concerns of ordinary people. From government agencies to the scientific establishment, the institutions that buttress modern society have been tainted by the corruption and poor performance of the ruling elites. The public has come to view these institutions as cash cows for the haves—and an oppressive machinery for bleeding the have-nots.

I analyzed the causes of this upheaval in my 2014 book, The Revolt of the Public. In brief, I argued that institutional elites have failed to adapt to the vast flows of information of the digital age. They reside at the top of great hierarchies that tower uneasily over a flattened socioeconomic landscape—and they want nothing to change. They crave the eternal preservation of the twentieth-century regime, in which they wielded unquestioned authority and had the power to conceal their dirty secrets. In pursuit of this ideal—fondly labeled “our democracy”—they have grown ever more reactionary and antidemocratic over the decades.

In Britain and Brazil today, you can land in jail for voicing antiestablishment opinions on social media. Here in the U.S., the Biden administration erected a censorship apparatus to mute online dissidence—and, we recently learned, “debanked,” or cast out of the financial system without right of appeal, those engaged in disfavored operations.

Maintaining The Free Press is Expensive!
To support independent journalism, and unlock all of our investigative stories and provocative commentary about the world as it actually is, subscribe below.
Already have an account?
Sign In
Martin Gurri
Martin Gurri is a former CIA analyst and author of The Revolt of the Public. He is currently a Visiting Research Fellow at Mercatus Center; his essays have appeared in Discourse, City Journal, and UnHerd, among other publications.
Tags:
Inauguration
Politics
Comments
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

No posts

For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersShopPodcastsVideoEvents
©2025 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More