The Free Press
Ask Our Washington Correspondent Anything
ForumNewslettersSign InSubscribe
Could President Trump Face a Pro-Life Revolt?
A demonstrator holds a banner during a January protest in Washington, D.C., calling on the Trump administration to ban the abortion pill. (REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz)
‘The movement preceded Donald Trump. It will outlast him,’ said activist Lila Rose.
By Audrey Fahlberg
06.02.26 — U.S. Politics
No description available.
--:--
--:--
Upgrade to Listen
Produced by ElevenLabs using AI narration
112
53
READ IN APP

In the final months of the 2024 presidential campaign, the pro-life movement felt that Donald Trump was drifting.

Alarmed by Trump’s public flirtation with supporting a Florida abortion-rights ballot measure, Live Action founder Lila Rose traveled to the president’s Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club in September 2024 for a private intervention. During a sit-down that lasted more than two hours, Rose tried to persuade the president to adopt a stronger pro-life position on the campaign trail. She showed Trump videos narrated by former abortion doctors explaining how procedures are performed in graphic detail, hoping to convince him not to abandon a social-conservative movement that had stood by him for three presidential campaigns. But his response unsettled her.

“He expressed deep revulsion to late-term abortion,” she recalled in a wide-ranging interview with The Free Press. But she left the conversation feeling Trump’s understanding of the issue differed fundamentally from her own. “It seemed that his opposition was based on the disgusting aspects of abortion, which is not necessarily the reason that millions of Americans want to stop abortion,” she said. “They want to stop it because it ends human life, and he seemed to have this misunderstanding about why abortion was so deeply wrong.”

Even more concerning, in her view, was the sympathy Trump expressed for some first-trimester abortions, especially those that involve young women who aren’t ready to have children, are in college, or are at the start of their careers. According to Rose, he also suggested that he wouldn’t restrict access to mifepristone, the chemical abortion pill that has become the newest front in the abortion wars during Trump’s second term.

Continue Reading The Free Press
To support our journalism, and unlock all of our investigative stories and provocative commentary about the world as it actually is, subscribe below.
Annual
$8.33/month
Billed as $100 yearly
Save $20!
Monthly
$10/month
Billed as $10 monthly
Already have an account?
Sign In
To read this article, sign in or subscribe
Audrey Fahlberg
Audrey Fahlberg is a Washington correspondent for The Free Press.
Tags:
Donald Trump
Abortion
Comments
Comments are closed. The conversation isn’t. Keep it going in The Free Press Forum.
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

No posts

For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersForumShopPodcastsVideoEvents
Download the app
Download on the Google Play Store
©2026 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice