Don't you think that Democrats jibing with the sensibilities of coastal elites would be synonymous with being allied to the Democratic tendencies of said coastal elites? Elites do not belong to the Dems - there are enough to go around, so that even the 'populist' wing of the GOP can claim a few. Quite a few. As in, let's jump on the late…
Don't you think that Democrats jibing with the sensibilities of coastal elites would be synonymous with being allied to the Democratic tendencies of said coastal elites? Elites do not belong to the Dems - there are enough to go around, so that even the 'populist' wing of the GOP can claim a few. Quite a few. As in, let's jump on the latest train to victory. Elites, in other words, are meaningless to both parties. It's a false dichotomy, and quoted ad nauseam by journalism like this.
Don't you think that Democrats jibing with the sensibilities of coastal elites would be synonymous with being allied to the Democratic tendencies of said coastal elites? Elites do not belong to the Dems - there are enough to go around, so that even the 'populist' wing of the GOP can claim a few. Quite a few. As in, let's jump on the latest train to victory. Elites, in other words, are meaningless to both parties. It's a false dichotomy, and quoted ad nauseam by journalism like this.