Another one coming out of the woodwork to diminish Trumps success of exposing the DC swamp for what it is. A bunch of lying no good SOB's who could care less about those of us who grind it out everyday and play by the rules.
Pathetic.
Barr did squat to hold any of the swamp to account for their BS.
Another one coming out of the woodwork to diminish Trumps success of exposing the DC swamp for what it is. A bunch of lying no good SOB's who could care less about those of us who grind it out everyday and play by the rules.
Pathetic.
Barr did squat to hold any of the swamp to account for their BS.
At some point, people are going to have to face reality. Not every single person that says what you donтАЩt want to believe about Trump is a lying liar. Barr didnтАЩt have to take the job. He did take it because he felt Trump was being persecuted and wanted to correct the historical record concerning Trump and the Russian collusion hoax. He was, perhaps, the only person that Trump hired that had an ounce of integrity.
Trump has the personality that Barr described. He wasnтАЩt a mellow leader. He had mental faults that were electorally devastating. He was so egotistical that he held the J6 rally at the Capitol, knowing full well that the swamp would set him up in some manner. He only considered his own ego. He didnтАЩt think about how a riot would effect every single Republican across the nation and how it would degrade the party. He was not a thoughtful leader. He canтАЩt win again. Get over it.
Not really. ItтАЩs sort of sad that people wonтАЩt accept the fact that Trump had a nasty temper, treated people that were there to help him like shit and couldnтАЩt understand that the swamp really was a swamp out to get him. How many different people that worked for Trump have to say he was a lousy leader before it penetrates some voters minds that itтАЩs possible those people are telling the truth?
It refers to people who believe the election was stolen, based on Trumps lies.
It refers to people who like Trump's policies tho they don't like him personally. But would vote for him again.
It refers to people who say, "You can't even *have* a logical discussion with a leftist." Well, that's true a lotta the time, so there is that. But it refers to these same people who just *can*not come up with a logical argument on their own.
It refers to people who say a person who sees both the good side and the bad side-a Trump is a troll. Or high on caffeine. Or drunk, two or three times in a row.
In short, it refers to the majority of commenters here, tho I don't have an exact count and there's still a few (very few) comments I haven't read yet.
I could go on, and on.. Like the Energizer Bunny.
But mainly it refers to people who find all the faults of the Woke, without seeing they have a lotta the same faults themselves. People who say the left aren't very *aware,* who aren't all that aware of themselves. Granted, giving Yourself the evil eye like You do others isn't everybody's cup-a tea. But to bray about how *others* aren't self-aware.. Weeeel, I've already gone on too long.
I donтАЩt see it that way. He appointed John Durham as a Special Counsel, the correct way to investigate the origins of Russia Collusion, in my opinion. He seems to me to be a by-the-book Attorney General. He gives ample credit to TrumpтАЩs policy initiatives and places blame squarely where it belongs: on progressives, who rationalized their tactics and on TrumpтАЩs own intemperance. I think we can all agree with his statement that if Trump could have simply restrained some of his unseemly behavior, he would have been re-elected and would have been a truly great President.
It wasn't Trump's behavior; it was his mouth. That's all. He said out loud the things a lot of us were thinking, which is what made him as popular as he was. His actions were good; his decisions were for the most part very well done.
Another one coming out of the woodwork to diminish Trumps success of exposing the DC swamp for what it is. A bunch of lying no good SOB's who could care less about those of us who grind it out everyday and play by the rules.
Pathetic.
Barr did squat to hold any of the swamp to account for their BS.
At some point, people are going to have to face reality. Not every single person that says what you donтАЩt want to believe about Trump is a lying liar. Barr didnтАЩt have to take the job. He did take it because he felt Trump was being persecuted and wanted to correct the historical record concerning Trump and the Russian collusion hoax. He was, perhaps, the only person that Trump hired that had an ounce of integrity.
Trump has the personality that Barr described. He wasnтАЩt a mellow leader. He had mental faults that were electorally devastating. He was so egotistical that he held the J6 rally at the Capitol, knowing full well that the swamp would set him up in some manner. He only considered his own ego. He didnтАЩt think about how a riot would effect every single Republican across the nation and how it would degrade the party. He was not a thoughtful leader. He canтАЩt win again. Get over it.
Feel better ?
And this is the typical reply from the MAGA crowd here.
You guys wanna claim You're in favor of "thought, reasoned discussion?"
Nup.
Not really. ItтАЩs sort of sad that people wonтАЩt accept the fact that Trump had a nasty temper, treated people that were there to help him like shit and couldnтАЩt understand that the swamp really was a swamp out to get him. How many different people that worked for Trump have to say he was a lousy leader before it penetrates some voters minds that itтАЩs possible those people are telling the truth?
Lol ! Get a life Karen.
And this is the typical reply from the MAGA crowd here.
You guys wanna claim You're in favor of "thought, reasoned discussion?"
Nup.
What exactly is the MAGA crowd ?
It refers to people who believe the election was stolen, based on Trumps lies.
It refers to people who like Trump's policies tho they don't like him personally. But would vote for him again.
It refers to people who say, "You can't even *have* a logical discussion with a leftist." Well, that's true a lotta the time, so there is that. But it refers to these same people who just *can*not come up with a logical argument on their own.
It refers to people who say a person who sees both the good side and the bad side-a Trump is a troll. Or high on caffeine. Or drunk, two or three times in a row.
In short, it refers to the majority of commenters here, tho I don't have an exact count and there's still a few (very few) comments I haven't read yet.
I could go on, and on.. Like the Energizer Bunny.
But mainly it refers to people who find all the faults of the Woke, without seeing they have a lotta the same faults themselves. People who say the left aren't very *aware,* who aren't all that aware of themselves. Granted, giving Yourself the evil eye like You do others isn't everybody's cup-a tea. But to bray about how *others* aren't self-aware.. Weeeel, I've already gone on too long.
It refers to people who believe the election was stolen
Boy are you way off base. Good luck pal.
Yeah, pal. Odds are pretty good You're in the MAGA crowd. Bet dollars to donuts, and it's why You can't see how far off base *You* are, pal.
I donтАЩt see it that way. He appointed John Durham as a Special Counsel, the correct way to investigate the origins of Russia Collusion, in my opinion. He seems to me to be a by-the-book Attorney General. He gives ample credit to TrumpтАЩs policy initiatives and places blame squarely where it belongs: on progressives, who rationalized their tactics and on TrumpтАЩs own intemperance. I think we can all agree with his statement that if Trump could have simply restrained some of his unseemly behavior, he would have been re-elected and would have been a truly great President.
And Durham has done what ? Not a god damn thing.
Hope you like the Progressive Kool-Aid. I'll pass.
It wasn't Trump's behavior; it was his mouth. That's all. He said out loud the things a lot of us were thinking, which is what made him as popular as he was. His actions were good; his decisions were for the most part very well done.
Nup. His mouth was just *one* the worst parts of his behavior. It was his behavior that led him to be such a poor loser. Actions good? Decisions good?
If he'd made the decision to listen to Bill Barr's advice, I'd say that his decision would-a been good.
would-a......
Who writes like that? What does that even mean? Where are you from?
Ooops. Always mistakes.
A small town a fair bit outside-a the capital of Ohio.
I already answered Your question, but You're too lame to notice.
I write like I talk. Like I "said." You have to *listen* if You wanna comprehend what I write a little better.
Ad hominems again. That the best You can come up with.
Well, yeah. It's the best You can come up with.
And this is the typical reply from the MAGA crowd here.
You guys wanna claim You're in favor of "thought, reasoned discussion?"
Nup.
You don't like the Way I write? Skip my comments. Do us both a favor.
Pass on by. Your personal attacks don't even register.
Yup.