That's an excellent point -- one can already see the fallacies that ChatGPT can "replace" ... whatever ... legal research, medical research, etc. Under attentive and informed human supervision, it's a powerful and useful tool. On its own, there's zero quality control and no "common sense" checks.
That's an excellent point -- one can already see the fallacies that ChatGPT can "replace" ... whatever ... legal research, medical research, etc. Under attentive and informed human supervision, it's a powerful and useful tool. On its own, there's zero quality control and no "common sense" checks.
That's an excellent point -- one can already see the fallacies that ChatGPT can "replace" ... whatever ... legal research, medical research, etc. Under attentive and informed human supervision, it's a powerful and useful tool. On its own, there's zero quality control and no "common sense" checks.