User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Joe Sandri's avatar

Garland will marshal all the forces of the FBI, state, and local government to address domestic terrorism allegedly wrought by Moms and Dads who don’t want CRT taught to their children. CRT is a racist, anti-America program based on Marxist ideology.

Fascinatingly, Merrick’s daughter and her husband stand to make a lot of money off CRT.

Rebecca Garland married Xan Tanner who is a founder and the president of Panorama Education, an analytical software and services company in Boston, The New York Times reported.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/10/08/conflict-of-interest-ag-garland-under-fire-over-reported-family-connections-to-crt-promoting-group-1145914/

Expand full comment
Katie Andraski's avatar

That company is gathering psychological data on American students. That too is chilling.

Expand full comment
Nancy Robertson's avatar

Yes. Panorama is spying on school children and getting these kids to report their parents. It's a massive invasion of privacy and must be stopped. Here's a youtube video I'm listening to now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r33QFt_Mv3A

Expand full comment
Katie Andraski's avatar

It does need to be stopped. It’s as though there is a dark intelligence behind these people—Brandon, Garland, Pelosi that makes it impossible for ordinary people to push back against their narrative/rule. It’s absurd to call parents domestic terrorists and to surveil their children with these tests. Yet hear we are. It’s also funky how incestuous these leaders are along with children/relatives that exert this kind of influence.

Expand full comment
Nancy Robertson's avatar

Yes. And artificial intelligence grows more powerful by the day. As the historian Yuval Noah Harari warns us, AI will soon know more about you than you know about yourself. And when that happens, you will lose your last shred of autonomy and agency.

The threat to privacy is much bigger than CRT or trans. That's why we need to protect the personal privacy of children and adults and keep our private lives private and free from the prying eyes of government and business.

Expand full comment
Katie Andraski's avatar

So very true. I was going to do an Ancestry DNA test but since 60 Minutes did a report on 23 and Me and their selling of data to China I’ve thought better of it. We live in perilous times.

Expand full comment
Nancy Robertson's avatar

I'm so glad to hear you didn't do a DNA test. I'd love to learn how much Neanderthal DNA I've inherited. But I will never, ever do one of those DNA tests. We have no absolutely control over how that data might be misused today or in the future.

Expand full comment
Katie Andraski's avatar

That’s for sure.

Expand full comment
jt's avatar

Yah about Rebecca G. But, see, I'm still not at ALL certain that this isn't some "sabre rattling" to squelch free speech. Future will tell. For one thing, there's likely to be at least SOME kind-a groundswell against this crap. They may double-down, or they may fold. No crystal ball here, on that one.

Expand full comment
Bruce Miller's avatar

There must be many FBI agents who are deeply troubled by this authoritarian nonsense. They need to speak up. And let us know who does and does not stand for liberty.

Expand full comment
Madjack's avatar

Bull. I’ve been waiting for these “true blue” FBI agents for over 5 years. They don’t exist. The FBI is totally corrupt. Evil organization

Expand full comment
jt's avatar

Yah, but I'm not sure many people are willing to put their LIVELIHOODS on the line.

Now, I recall "Profiles in Courage" written by JFK. Probably outta print by now.

Expand full comment