Hey there, the argument is not an absolute one: no vaccines or produce vaccines with zero harm. Rather, we should treat vaccines as we treat every other medication provided to the general population, namely that they should be properly tested via double blind studies and that corporations face legal and financial liability for negligence…
Hey there, the argument is not an absolute one: no vaccines or produce vaccines with zero harm. Rather, we should treat vaccines as we treat every other medication provided to the general population, namely that they should be properly tested via double blind studies and that corporations face legal and financial liability for negligence. Also, there should be a strictly enforcement mechanism to track any harms. It is the lack of transparency that is making folks refuse to take any vaccines which may cause more harm in the end. Again, pharmas have so captured the debate that they make us believe in an all or nothing approach: either free us from all risk or there are no vaccines. A false choice that we and corporations do not accept for other medical treatments. agree re your response on hep b... point was to point that corporations are pushing vaccines onto children for no apparent health reason.
This is the elephant in the room: why are vaccinations exempt from all of the liability that other drugs and procedures are subject to?
When the medical establishment says "You must allow us to inject this substance, but if you experience any harm as a result, you cannot sue the manufacturer, and no one will be held responsible for the damage you experience," it's no wonder that people are hesitant, despite the risks of not getting vaccinated.
Hey there, the argument is not an absolute one: no vaccines or produce vaccines with zero harm. Rather, we should treat vaccines as we treat every other medication provided to the general population, namely that they should be properly tested via double blind studies and that corporations face legal and financial liability for negligence. Also, there should be a strictly enforcement mechanism to track any harms. It is the lack of transparency that is making folks refuse to take any vaccines which may cause more harm in the end. Again, pharmas have so captured the debate that they make us believe in an all or nothing approach: either free us from all risk or there are no vaccines. A false choice that we and corporations do not accept for other medical treatments. agree re your response on hep b... point was to point that corporations are pushing vaccines onto children for no apparent health reason.
This is the elephant in the room: why are vaccinations exempt from all of the liability that other drugs and procedures are subject to?
When the medical establishment says "You must allow us to inject this substance, but if you experience any harm as a result, you cannot sue the manufacturer, and no one will be held responsible for the damage you experience," it's no wonder that people are hesitant, despite the risks of not getting vaccinated.