I totally disagree with you that trials proved IVM and HCQ ineffective. There are ways to skew trial results and much has been written about the late stage infection status of patients, the very high dosages, and the compilation of data weeks out from initial dosage that watered down the results. Further, clinical data from frontline doc…
I totally disagree with you that trials proved IVM and HCQ ineffective. There are ways to skew trial results and much has been written about the late stage infection status of patients, the very high dosages, and the compilation of data weeks out from initial dosage that watered down the results. Further, clinical data from frontline doctors Pierre Kory, Paul Marek and Zev Zelenko proved without doubt that these medications worked--very few of their patients were hospitalized, let alone died, and we’re talking about the elderly, many with co-morbidity. Tens of thousands of saved lives.
IVQ was effective in all stages of the illness, but especially when treatment began early. Time for randomized control trials amounted to a death sentence, and the State propaganda calling IVQ a horse paste was not relying on any government study--they smeared it despite the clinical results from front line Covid critical doctors--none of who had a political ax to grind, all of whom were highly experienced, credentialed and qualified.
IVM has been administered billions of times, is proven safe at correct dosages, and is inexpensive. Your assertion that after unremarkable RCT results the case for IVM should have been closed is outrageous and suggests to me that you yourself are captured and what they call controlled opposition.
The experimental Covid gene therapy has injured or killed millions of people, and it serves the public to dig deeper into the harms that other vaccines have caused. Ed Dowd, Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Michael Yeadon, among others, have documented the harms and questioned the pseudoscience promoted during the lockdowns.
This was a totalitarian play, well rehearsed - and RFK has it right. We have to question EVERYTHING we are being told about EVERYTHING!
I wonder how many patients you lost during the pandemic. I’d wager those prescribing IVM off label did much better.
I totally disagree with you that trials proved IVM and HCQ ineffective. There are ways to skew trial results and much has been written about the late stage infection status of patients, the very high dosages, and the compilation of data weeks out from initial dosage that watered down the results. Further, clinical data from frontline doctors Pierre Kory, Paul Marek and Zev Zelenko proved without doubt that these medications worked--very few of their patients were hospitalized, let alone died, and we’re talking about the elderly, many with co-morbidity. Tens of thousands of saved lives.
IVQ was effective in all stages of the illness, but especially when treatment began early. Time for randomized control trials amounted to a death sentence, and the State propaganda calling IVQ a horse paste was not relying on any government study--they smeared it despite the clinical results from front line Covid critical doctors--none of who had a political ax to grind, all of whom were highly experienced, credentialed and qualified.
IVM has been administered billions of times, is proven safe at correct dosages, and is inexpensive. Your assertion that after unremarkable RCT results the case for IVM should have been closed is outrageous and suggests to me that you yourself are captured and what they call controlled opposition.
The experimental Covid gene therapy has injured or killed millions of people, and it serves the public to dig deeper into the harms that other vaccines have caused. Ed Dowd, Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, and Michael Yeadon, among others, have documented the harms and questioned the pseudoscience promoted during the lockdowns.
This was a totalitarian play, well rehearsed - and RFK has it right. We have to question EVERYTHING we are being told about EVERYTHING!
I wonder how many patients you lost during the pandemic. I’d wager those prescribing IVM off label did much better.
Dr. Prasad's take on Ivermectin: He got it wrong.
Please take some time to peruse this website: https://c19ivm.org/meta.html