The Free Press
The Free Press App Is Here!
NewslettersSign InSubscribe

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
What Republicans Get Right—and Wrong—About Medicaid
What Republicans Get Right—and Wrong—About Medicaid
President Donald Trump speaks to journalists before boarding Air Force One from Morristown Municipal Airport in Morristown, New Jersey, May 25, 2025. (Saul Loeb via Getty Images)
The president is worried about the political cost of ‘fucking around with Medicaid.’ But his party is right to grapple with the program’s ballooning costs.
By Charles Lane
05.28.25 — U.S. Politics
--:--
--:--
Upgrade to Listen
5 mins
Produced by ElevenLabs using AI narration
104
88

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
What Republicans Get Right—and Wrong—About Medicaid

Rallying House Republicans to pass a version of his One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) last week, Donald Trump instructed them, “Don’t fuck around with Medicaid.” The White House brandished polls explaining that reforms to the program are politically risky. In the end, though, the House could not avoid $700 billion in Medicaid reductions.

The savings offset, albeit only partially, the multitrillion-dollar cost of other Republican priorities: extending the 2017 tax cuts and increasing spending on border security and defense. In this vast bundle of tax, spending, and immigration changes, now on its way to the Republican-controlled Senate, Democrats spy an opportunity. “The fact that the Republican Party stands for slashing Medicaid. . . all to give tax breaks for the billionaires, helps us,” Chuck Schumer of New York, the top Senate Democrat, said. “The House bill has put a stamp on who the Republican Party is.”

Media coverage is amplifying the Democratic message: “How the GOP’s Proposed Medicaid Cuts Could Affect Millions of Family Caregivers,” reads a headline from PBS News Hour’s website, typical of the genre.

Enjoying the story?
Enter your email to read this article and receive our daily newsletter.
Already have an account?
Sign In
Charles Lane

Charles Lane was previously an editor and columnist for The Washington Post, where he was a finalist for the 2009 Pulitzer Prize. The author of three books, he has also been a foreign correspondent and editor of the New Republic; his action against a notorious journalistic fraud at that magazine became the subject of the acclaimed 2003 film, Shattered Glass.

Tags:
Donald Trump
Politics
Republicans
Comments
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
More in Donald Trump
For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersShopPodcastsVideoEvents
Download the app
Download on the Google Play Store
©2025 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice

Share