Bazelon weakens her own case with this line: "The victim was not hurt and the crime itself lasted less than two minutes." It's almost funny that her "side" considers not using someone's pronouns as an act of harm, if not outright violence, but here she dismisses the impact of an ARMED robbery on a victim. Really? It took two minutes so b…
Bazelon weakens her own case with this line: "The victim was not hurt and the crime itself lasted less than two minutes." It's almost funny that her "side" considers not using someone's pronouns as an act of harm, if not outright violence, but here she dismisses the impact of an ARMED robbery on a victim. Really? It took two minutes so being threatened and robbed with a gun or knife is no big deal? If her client is innocent, clearly what happened is a miscarriage of justice, but this line sort of unmasks her real perspective.
Bazelon weakens her own case with this line: "The victim was not hurt and the crime itself lasted less than two minutes." It's almost funny that her "side" considers not using someone's pronouns as an act of harm, if not outright violence, but here she dismisses the impact of an ARMED robbery on a victim. Really? It took two minutes so being threatened and robbed with a gun or knife is no big deal? If her client is innocent, clearly what happened is a miscarriage of justice, but this line sort of unmasks her real perspective.