Why does the Free Press ignore the fact that the politicization of the DOJ and the attack upon the Rule of Law began in earnest with Barack Obama’s DOJ investigating Michael Flynn for talking to the Russian Ambassador even though it was clearly not illegal.
And when is the Free Press going to publicize the composition of BRICS?
Why does the Free Press ignore the fact that the politicization of the DOJ and the attack upon the Rule of Law began in earnest with Barack Obama’s DOJ investigating Michael Flynn for talking to the Russian Ambassador even though it was clearly not illegal.
And when is the Free Press going to publicize the composition of BRICS?
There are those who founded The Free Press who count themselves among the Left and were pro-Obama, seemingly giving him a pass on a lot of what he did that I would view as wrong (especially worsening race relations big time). I draw, however, a big distinction between today's progressives and the old liberal democrats. People like Jonathan Haidt are old liberals because of what liberalism always stood for that now it is more right leaning folks who are standing for.
Why does the Free Press ignore the fact that the politicization of the DOJ and the attack upon the Rule of Law began in earnest with Barack Obama’s DOJ investigating Michael Flynn for talking to the Russian Ambassador even though it was clearly not illegal.
And when is the Free Press going to publicize the composition of BRICS?
There are those who founded The Free Press who count themselves among the Left and were pro-Obama, seemingly giving him a pass on a lot of what he did that I would view as wrong (especially worsening race relations big time). I draw, however, a big distinction between today's progressives and the old liberal democrats. People like Jonathan Haidt are old liberals because of what liberalism always stood for that now it is more right leaning folks who are standing for.