If it were easy to determine that something is "easy rescue", then perhaps, perhaps, I would agree. But this is an unproven type of vaccine (mRNA) with proven lethal side effects for some individuals.
I am vaccinated, but not for the common good. But let's say that I did get vaccinated "for the common good". A…
If it were easy to determine that something is "easy rescue", then perhaps, perhaps, I would agree. But this is an unproven type of vaccine (mRNA) with proven lethal side effects for some individuals.
I am vaccinated, but not for the common good. But let's say that I did get vaccinated "for the common good". And let's say that a few years down the road I die from side effects of the vaccine that are currently unknown. Will "the common good" compensate my family?
Think of how the definition of eminent domain has changed from "public use" to "public benefit". That now allows legislators to seize property from an individual and sell it to someone else who just may use it "better". Of course, "better" can easily be a subjective measure. And, strangely enough, the beneficiaries of such "public benefit" decisions are going to be legislators themselves who take an ownership interest in the "someone else" prior to making the "public benefit" decision.
"Common Good" is a weapon used by politicians to get what they want. "Common Good" is the foundation of tyranny.
"Duty of easy rescue"...
If it were easy to determine that something is "easy rescue", then perhaps, perhaps, I would agree. But this is an unproven type of vaccine (mRNA) with proven lethal side effects for some individuals.
I am vaccinated, but not for the common good. But let's say that I did get vaccinated "for the common good". And let's say that a few years down the road I die from side effects of the vaccine that are currently unknown. Will "the common good" compensate my family?
Think of how the definition of eminent domain has changed from "public use" to "public benefit". That now allows legislators to seize property from an individual and sell it to someone else who just may use it "better". Of course, "better" can easily be a subjective measure. And, strangely enough, the beneficiaries of such "public benefit" decisions are going to be legislators themselves who take an ownership interest in the "someone else" prior to making the "public benefit" decision.
"Common Good" is a weapon used by politicians to get what they want. "Common Good" is the foundation of tyranny.