Ann Coulter was on Bill Maher's show, and they were discussing some horrible crime that had occurred, and the identity of the suspect hadn't been released. Ann's comment was that this means the suspect isn't white; if he were white, he would have been paraded as a right-wing extremist.
I believe Ann might think that if the teenage suspect…
Ann Coulter was on Bill Maher's show, and they were discussing some horrible crime that had occurred, and the identity of the suspect hadn't been released. Ann's comment was that this means the suspect isn't white; if he were white, he would have been paraded as a right-wing extremist.
I believe Ann might think that if the teenage suspect in the knifing attack in Australia did not speak Arabic, we would not be reading about it in The Free Press.
And Oliver, thank you so much for pointing out that the person in Australia who did actually kill 6 people wasn't a crazed Muslim lunatic. Apparently you believe we would assume otherwise unless you told us. And why would we assume that? Because we read The Free Press?
I think most editors--strike that, all editors--would have reordered that part of your story. You lead with the 6 deaths, of course, then mention that there was also another attack leaving people wounded. That is, unless the entire purpose of mentioning any of it is simply to point to another attack by a Muslim person.
Ann Coulter was on Bill Maher's show, and they were discussing some horrible crime that had occurred, and the identity of the suspect hadn't been released. Ann's comment was that this means the suspect isn't white; if he were white, he would have been paraded as a right-wing extremist.
I believe Ann might think that if the teenage suspect in the knifing attack in Australia did not speak Arabic, we would not be reading about it in The Free Press.
And Oliver, thank you so much for pointing out that the person in Australia who did actually kill 6 people wasn't a crazed Muslim lunatic. Apparently you believe we would assume otherwise unless you told us. And why would we assume that? Because we read The Free Press?
I think most editors--strike that, all editors--would have reordered that part of your story. You lead with the 6 deaths, of course, then mention that there was also another attack leaving people wounded. That is, unless the entire purpose of mentioning any of it is simply to point to another attack by a Muslim person.