These are not facts. These are Ms Kennedy's opinions with a smattering of assertions of fact. And the statements are so venomous as to indicate significant bias. Back in the day (e.g., read All The President's Men by Woodward and Bernstein), one person's story was not suitable to be published unless the reporter could find independent ve…
These are not facts. These are Ms Kennedy's opinions with a smattering of assertions of fact. And the statements are so venomous as to indicate significant bias. Back in the day (e.g., read All The President's Men by Woodward and Bernstein), one person's story was not suitable to be published unless the reporter could find independent verification. Can we verify that RFK Jr was responsible for the addictive behaviors of other family members? That his ownership of birds of prey reveal a character flaw (particularly ridiculous)? That he created chaos wherever he went (Lucifer is a piker!)?
These are not facts. These are Ms Kennedy's opinions with a smattering of assertions of fact. And the statements are so venomous as to indicate significant bias. Back in the day (e.g., read All The President's Men by Woodward and Bernstein), one person's story was not suitable to be published unless the reporter could find independent verification. Can we verify that RFK Jr was responsible for the addictive behaviors of other family members? That his ownership of birds of prey reveal a character flaw (particularly ridiculous)? That he created chaos wherever he went (Lucifer is a piker!)?