The Free Press
NewslettersSign InSubscribe

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
Things Worth Remembering: The Poet Who Captured Immortality
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Things Worth Remembering: The Poet Who Captured Immortality
(D.B. Bartruff/Corbis via Getty Images)
Stephen Spender was not a great poet. But he came close to greatness when he wrote about those who were.
By Douglas Murray
05.07.23 — Culture and Ideas
82
318

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
Things Worth Remembering: The Poet Who Captured Immortality
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Welcome back to Douglas Murray’s Sunday column, Things Worth Remembering, where he presents passages from great poets he has committed to memory—and explains why you should, too. And if you want to listen to Douglas read this week’s work, from Stephen Spender’s “The Truly Great,” click below.

1×
0:00
-2:04
Audio playback is not supported on your browser. Please upgrade.

Immortality is a tricky word. For various reasons, it crops up as an idea far more in poetry than in any other art form. There is a recognition that novels, for instance, are likely to have their day and then lose it. But the aim of poets—sometimes self-consciously, as with Dickinson—is to write for posterity. To be a poet is almost, by definition, to write for the ages.

The fact that very few poets are likely to make that grade is irrelevant. Certain people do—or, at least, have done so far. We have had The Iliad for almost three thousand years, and in human terms that may be about as long as anything can be around.

Still, it has always seemed to me that there is an obsession about posterity in poetry, in part because there is a nervousness about it. What are the real chances? In A Mathematician’s Apology, the great Cambridge mathematician G. H. Hardy wrote something that should terrify most poets: “Archimedes will be remembered when Aeschylus is forgotten, because languages die and mathematical ideas do not. ‘Immortality’ may be a silly word, but probably a mathematician has the best chance of whatever it may mean.” If Hardy is correct, then you might say that the poet’s search for immortality is a fool’s errand. Yet, if it is possible outside of the realm of mathematical facts (which, once proved, cannot be forgotten), then poetry has the best chance.

One of the poets who wrote best about poetry and immortality was not himself a great poet. 

Maintaining The Free Press is Expensive!
To support independent journalism, and unlock all of our investigative stories and provocative commentary about the world as it actually is, subscribe below.
Already have an account?
Sign In
Douglas Murray
Douglas Murray is the best-selling author of seven books, and is a regular contributor at the New York Post, National Review, and other publications. His work as a reporter has taken him to Iraq, North Korea, northern Nigeria, and Ukraine. Born in London, he now lives in New York.
Tags:
Culture
Comments
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

No posts

For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersShopPodcastsVideoEvents
©2025 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More