Commenting has been turned off for this post
⭠ Return to thread
TxFrog's avatar

Richard Glossip was convicted in two trials, so i would guess not everyone agrees he is not guilty. The Supreme Court did not rule he is innocent, only that he must receive a third trial.

From The Hill: "In 2023, Republican State Attorney General Gentner Drummond said new evidence persuaded him that Glossip’s trial was not fair. Drummond has said he does not believe Glossip is innocent and has suggested he could face a new trial."

Expand full comment