So the police stood outside the door while the shooter was inside, shooting. The police waited for the janitor to unlock the door, and once he did, the police entered and killed the shooter. Is the reason the police stood outside the door because it was locked and they couldn't get inside? In every piece I read about this, that seems to …
So the police stood outside the door while the shooter was inside, shooting. The police waited for the janitor to unlock the door, and once he did, the police entered and killed the shooter. Is the reason the police stood outside the door because it was locked and they couldn't get inside? In every piece I read about this, that seems to be the case. They couldn't get in because the door was locked. Also, while the sentiment for refusing to name the shooter is understandable, it's also vain. We all know the name of the shooter and besides, he's not uplifted by the use of his name anyway. He's dead. The next point: it's just the absolute height of hypocrisy to decry the lack of courage on behalf of the same police officers who were demeaned and insulted for engaging in the messy work of their job. Some NYPD came to my door in the summer of 2020 to get the footage after an infant was killed in gang crossfire over on the next block. They told me that the night before, they had to just stand around and watch a man with an automatic weapon spray a busy street with bullets because they are no longer allowed to grab perpetrators and restrain them in the ways that actually work. All new guidelines that basically defuse the cops and give the criminals full reign to do their jobs. That move Chauvin placed on Floyd's SHOULDER was to restrain him from going into excited delirium. That summer of 2020 was the greatest gas lighting hoax in recent history. Couldn't even say that there are bad people out there and a huge percentage of them are black people who don't agree that black lives matter. That infant slaughtered on the next block was a black infant killed by black criminals. FYI. Back to this school shooting, I also noticed that a lot of those police officers look really out of shape. They're overweight and probably can't run without getting a heart attack. And let's all praise the fact that "toxic masculinity" was not deployed that day...because folks, you can't have your cake and eat it too. So sick of the obvious inability to see cause and effect on behalf of most of the population. We're lost in so many ways, I can't see a way out of it.
They couldn’t get in because the door was locked? Is the lock made of titanium? They couldn’t break the lock? Break the door? Seriously? That’s the excuse?
You nailed it - “greatest gaslighting hoax” I would say in American history second to the Dems peddling of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax that laid the groundwork for George Floyd riots. Overnight the actions of one bad police officer (and those other officers compromised around him) and a criminal drug addict escalated like a wildfire to suddenly the entire nation being irredeemably racist. That ethos continues to persist today. It’s truly shocking how quickly the media and activists were able to create a culture of self loathing not based on hard facts. This something way beyond propaganda.
I agree with everything you said except not naming the shooter does not matter. I have been following these matters since Columbine and a significant portion of the shooters idolized earlier shooters.
I respect this but the fact remains that we all know who they were and not naming them doesn't stop anything -- it's done in vain. There's a very interesting analysis on UNHERD -- https://unherd.com/2022/05/why-young-men-become-shooters/?tl_inbound=1&tl_groups[0]=18743&tl_period_type=3&mc_cid=6e6ea47f31&mc_eid=3e00451bcf -- The shooting isn't done because an idol did it. It's done to achieve a FEELING OF POTENCY. I'd say feminism has had a hand in this trend (though there were school shootings in the 19th century); the kid who shot up Sandy Hook was estranged from his father and smothered by his mother, for example. Fewer and fewer outlets for physical aggression, demonizing male sexuality, making it much more difficult to get married and provide for a family...all the while moaning that this is a "patriarchy." It's not. It's a toxic matriarchy.
Oh I definitely know about the incels and I think there is validity to your point. A lot of validity. Back when it was as simple as matriarchy and patriarchy (you know, when people still knew what a man and woman were) most rational people understood that it takes both, working as a team, to successfully raise children. As for naming or not naming these demons, my.personal decision.is to not do so so as not to glorify them.
Now add to your comment that Obama memorialized the dead children by changing the subject to George Floyd - that this was not only reasonable but necessary - and we can see just how deeply brainwashed these extremists are.
And it's very important to understand that in their own eyes they are neither.
So the police stood outside the door while the shooter was inside, shooting. The police waited for the janitor to unlock the door, and once he did, the police entered and killed the shooter. Is the reason the police stood outside the door because it was locked and they couldn't get inside? In every piece I read about this, that seems to be the case. They couldn't get in because the door was locked. Also, while the sentiment for refusing to name the shooter is understandable, it's also vain. We all know the name of the shooter and besides, he's not uplifted by the use of his name anyway. He's dead. The next point: it's just the absolute height of hypocrisy to decry the lack of courage on behalf of the same police officers who were demeaned and insulted for engaging in the messy work of their job. Some NYPD came to my door in the summer of 2020 to get the footage after an infant was killed in gang crossfire over on the next block. They told me that the night before, they had to just stand around and watch a man with an automatic weapon spray a busy street with bullets because they are no longer allowed to grab perpetrators and restrain them in the ways that actually work. All new guidelines that basically defuse the cops and give the criminals full reign to do their jobs. That move Chauvin placed on Floyd's SHOULDER was to restrain him from going into excited delirium. That summer of 2020 was the greatest gas lighting hoax in recent history. Couldn't even say that there are bad people out there and a huge percentage of them are black people who don't agree that black lives matter. That infant slaughtered on the next block was a black infant killed by black criminals. FYI. Back to this school shooting, I also noticed that a lot of those police officers look really out of shape. They're overweight and probably can't run without getting a heart attack. And let's all praise the fact that "toxic masculinity" was not deployed that day...because folks, you can't have your cake and eat it too. So sick of the obvious inability to see cause and effect on behalf of most of the population. We're lost in so many ways, I can't see a way out of it.
They couldn’t get in because the door was locked? Is the lock made of titanium? They couldn’t break the lock? Break the door? Seriously? That’s the excuse?
You nailed it - “greatest gaslighting hoax” I would say in American history second to the Dems peddling of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax that laid the groundwork for George Floyd riots. Overnight the actions of one bad police officer (and those other officers compromised around him) and a criminal drug addict escalated like a wildfire to suddenly the entire nation being irredeemably racist. That ethos continues to persist today. It’s truly shocking how quickly the media and activists were able to create a culture of self loathing not based on hard facts. This something way beyond propaganda.
I agree with everything you said except not naming the shooter does not matter. I have been following these matters since Columbine and a significant portion of the shooters idolized earlier shooters.
I respect this but the fact remains that we all know who they were and not naming them doesn't stop anything -- it's done in vain. There's a very interesting analysis on UNHERD -- https://unherd.com/2022/05/why-young-men-become-shooters/?tl_inbound=1&tl_groups[0]=18743&tl_period_type=3&mc_cid=6e6ea47f31&mc_eid=3e00451bcf -- The shooting isn't done because an idol did it. It's done to achieve a FEELING OF POTENCY. I'd say feminism has had a hand in this trend (though there were school shootings in the 19th century); the kid who shot up Sandy Hook was estranged from his father and smothered by his mother, for example. Fewer and fewer outlets for physical aggression, demonizing male sexuality, making it much more difficult to get married and provide for a family...all the while moaning that this is a "patriarchy." It's not. It's a toxic matriarchy.
The article you referenced was definitely worth reading. I even found the reply’s to the article gave even more perspectives to this issue.
Oh I definitely know about the incels and I think there is validity to your point. A lot of validity. Back when it was as simple as matriarchy and patriarchy (you know, when people still knew what a man and woman were) most rational people understood that it takes both, working as a team, to successfully raise children. As for naming or not naming these demons, my.personal decision.is to not do so so as not to glorify them.
Now add to your comment that Obama memorialized the dead children by changing the subject to George Floyd - that this was not only reasonable but necessary - and we can see just how deeply brainwashed these extremists are.
And it's very important to understand that in their own eyes they are neither.