Indeed there are many cases where computerized "assistance" ends up a total mess, and a few where an ideologically-motivated programmer skews results. But the possibility that an internal Bad Actor cheats isn't likely, and I kinda doubt that the new "improved" system would be more vulnerable to cheating than the old one. Honestly I don't…
Indeed there are many cases where computerized "assistance" ends up a total mess, and a few where an ideologically-motivated programmer skews results. But the possibility that an internal Bad Actor cheats isn't likely, and I kinda doubt that the new "improved" system would be more vulnerable to cheating than the old one. Honestly I don't know.
One way to check for monkey business would be to look at results, broken down by demographic of your choice, after the change vs before.
I'd say the company that runs it has a good track record, and has solid incentives to maintain its reputation. That doesn't guarantee anything, but ...
Indeed there are many cases where computerized "assistance" ends up a total mess, and a few where an ideologically-motivated programmer skews results. But the possibility that an internal Bad Actor cheats isn't likely, and I kinda doubt that the new "improved" system would be more vulnerable to cheating than the old one. Honestly I don't know.
One way to check for monkey business would be to look at results, broken down by demographic of your choice, after the change vs before.
I'd say the company that runs it has a good track record, and has solid incentives to maintain its reputation. That doesn't guarantee anything, but ...