Oh Ethan, what's the matter? Have multiple blonde women turned you down for a date? The NCAA was not being body positive in fining those women, they were just hammering women. It's something they seem to do a lot of by allowing men to compete with women. And then they get upset when women empower themselves. There are a lot of NCAA footb…
Oh Ethan, what's the matter? Have multiple blonde women turned you down for a date? The NCAA was not being body positive in fining those women, they were just hammering women. It's something they seem to do a lot of by allowing men to compete with women. And then they get upset when women empower themselves. There are a lot of NCAA football coaches who have done a lot worse than the Miami basketball coach and they were never touched .
By the way, don'tworry about the women who aren't blondes on the basketball court, if they're really good they get basketball deals. If they're really smart and pretty, they get Instagram deals. Capitalism works.
Now I'll let you get back to trying to find a date.
I find it particularly hilarious that he then proceeds to mention the “serious” NCAA female athletes, and mentions Angel Reece 🤣. Has he watched Angel play? Perused her Insta? She brands herself as “Bayou Barbie” and very much relishes her glamorous persona, always showing up to play with a full set of fake lashes. She’s much more reminiscent of Anna K to me, than the muscular Cavinder twins ever were.
Angel Reece is definitely a better player than the Cavinder twins, but she’s by no means as talented as some of the other NCAA basketball players. She’s a talented, fierce competitor who is cashing in on both her talents and looks. She has more than double the Insta followers as the Cavinder twins. My point is that the author only seems to take issue with attractive blonde athletes - he picks on the twins yet seems to have no problem with Reece, who is also a beautiful young woman whose social media is equally focused on looks, and who shows up to every game with more makeup than a Kardashian (perhaps the author, as a male, does not understand how much time it takes to create her game day look?). If profitability were based mostly on athletic prowess, someone like Caitlin Clark should be making more than Reece - but he gives Reece a pass.
I can't help but see articles like this as projection that speaks more about the author than anything else. We get it, Ethan, you have a "hot girl" problem.
Oh Ethan, what's the matter? Have multiple blonde women turned you down for a date? The NCAA was not being body positive in fining those women, they were just hammering women. It's something they seem to do a lot of by allowing men to compete with women. And then they get upset when women empower themselves. There are a lot of NCAA football coaches who have done a lot worse than the Miami basketball coach and they were never touched .
By the way, don'tworry about the women who aren't blondes on the basketball court, if they're really good they get basketball deals. If they're really smart and pretty, they get Instagram deals. Capitalism works.
Now I'll let you get back to trying to find a date.
I find it particularly hilarious that he then proceeds to mention the “serious” NCAA female athletes, and mentions Angel Reece 🤣. Has he watched Angel play? Perused her Insta? She brands herself as “Bayou Barbie” and very much relishes her glamorous persona, always showing up to play with a full set of fake lashes. She’s much more reminiscent of Anna K to me, than the muscular Cavinder twins ever were.
Is Angel Reese better?
Has she had a better career?
Does anyone have info on that?
Angel Reece is definitely a better player than the Cavinder twins, but she’s by no means as talented as some of the other NCAA basketball players. She’s a talented, fierce competitor who is cashing in on both her talents and looks. She has more than double the Insta followers as the Cavinder twins. My point is that the author only seems to take issue with attractive blonde athletes - he picks on the twins yet seems to have no problem with Reece, who is also a beautiful young woman whose social media is equally focused on looks, and who shows up to every game with more makeup than a Kardashian (perhaps the author, as a male, does not understand how much time it takes to create her game day look?). If profitability were based mostly on athletic prowess, someone like Caitlin Clark should be making more than Reece - but he gives Reece a pass.
I can't help but see articles like this as projection that speaks more about the author than anything else. We get it, Ethan, you have a "hot girl" problem.
So true...most texts do tell you more about the author than they do the topic they are supposedly about.
I could not agree more. Poor Ethan.