No doubt. I have been referring to the alphabet legacy media as the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party, and as the true cancer in America, for years. That if the alphabet legacy media were just honest reporters and journalists with integrity, the Democrat Party would be at most a fringe element in American politics.
If Trump is the one who was finally able to expose them...maybe he's *not* the moron you say he is.
For some reason this guy is putting an incredible amount of energy into defending Bari's honor to everyone less than 1000% impressed by the mea culpa of a journalist who didn't realize that journalists were biased.
so we're clear, I thought that Wiess made a fool of herself on Rogan with her Assad Toady comment (in reference to Tulsi Gabbard). That was my first intro to her, and she appeared to me as a stupid, uninformed propagandist, repeating uncritically what she heard from her woke NYT propagandist colleagues over lunch in Williamsburg.
There was something in her tho, that had me listen to her being interviewed by Jordan Peterson, that had me rethink he as being more than just a blue anon member, which brings me here. Not to defend her, but rather to discuss her article. I'll try one last time to see if I can make a case:
Do you believe, for a sec, that the blue anon, or blue anon adjacent group don't believe that Trump said to drink bleach, or actually said that Charlottesville had good people on both sides, or that the pee tape was true? Hint, they still believe all that. So if there's someone, like Wiess, who is from that side, but seeing that her side are out in the open propogandists for the state, why not give her kudos to make it ok for other blue anon adjacent folks to open up their minds? Why kick her?
Jimmy Dore sets this up the best: You can hear the crowd react at the beginning: they know what's coming.
Yeah, similarly, didn't one of the Young Turks issue a similar epiphany recently?
Great and all, but I'm not sure she bothered to take the next logical step, and investigate and evaluate just exactly WHY it took her so long to see and understand that which most of us saw and understood fourteen MONTHS ago.
"It turns out that account was mostly wrong."
"Mostly", indeed. The only thing you got right was that he was 17 years old.
You're a reporter by trade, and yet *I* knew that account was "mostly wrong" as of...the last days of August 2020.
Wonder why that was...
I'll try. The friends and co-workers of Mx Wiess have been exposed to be far more than 'wrong.' Far more even than committing noble lies.
They've been propagandizing the public intentionally.
Ironically, it was that moron Trump who exposed them.
What is this Mx Weiss BS. WTF is Mx? It’s Miss or Ms.
No doubt. I have been referring to the alphabet legacy media as the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party, and as the true cancer in America, for years. That if the alphabet legacy media were just honest reporters and journalists with integrity, the Democrat Party would be at most a fringe element in American politics.
If Trump is the one who was finally able to expose them...maybe he's *not* the moron you say he is.
For some reason this guy is putting an incredible amount of energy into defending Bari's honor to everyone less than 1000% impressed by the mea culpa of a journalist who didn't realize that journalists were biased.
so we're clear, I thought that Wiess made a fool of herself on Rogan with her Assad Toady comment (in reference to Tulsi Gabbard). That was my first intro to her, and she appeared to me as a stupid, uninformed propagandist, repeating uncritically what she heard from her woke NYT propagandist colleagues over lunch in Williamsburg.
There was something in her tho, that had me listen to her being interviewed by Jordan Peterson, that had me rethink he as being more than just a blue anon member, which brings me here. Not to defend her, but rather to discuss her article. I'll try one last time to see if I can make a case:
Do you believe, for a sec, that the blue anon, or blue anon adjacent group don't believe that Trump said to drink bleach, or actually said that Charlottesville had good people on both sides, or that the pee tape was true? Hint, they still believe all that. So if there's someone, like Wiess, who is from that side, but seeing that her side are out in the open propogandists for the state, why not give her kudos to make it ok for other blue anon adjacent folks to open up their minds? Why kick her?
Jimmy Dore sets this up the best: You can hear the crowd react at the beginning: they know what's coming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS-sxJFn6O0
Yeah, similarly, didn't one of the Young Turks issue a similar epiphany recently?
Great and all, but I'm not sure she bothered to take the next logical step, and investigate and evaluate just exactly WHY it took her so long to see and understand that which most of us saw and understood fourteen MONTHS ago.
Superb comment!
Other than my similarly/similar redundancy, which I only just noticed now!