The Free Press
Think for Yourself in the Forum
ForumNewslettersSign InSubscribe
It’s Not Just Red Dye No. 3. It’s All Our Stuff.
“It’s hard to shake the feeling that synthetic dyes are just the tip of a very large iceberg,” writes Joshua Lachter for The Free Press. (Heidi Besen via Alamy Stock Photo)
We no longer use whale oil for lighting. Why use PFAS to make things nonstick? Time to demand healthier products.
By Joshua Lachter
01.21.25 — The Big Read
521
862
READ IN APP

Last week, the Food and Drug Administration banned Red Dye No. 3—a coloring found lurking in everything from pastries to pills. Regulators banned it on the grounds that several studies have shown a worrying tendency for the dye to cause thyroid cancer in animals. Since 1990, it has been prohibited for use in cosmetics, but it has somehow persisted in food and medicine.

Relieved by the ban? Don’t be. Red Dye No. 3 is set to be replaced by. . . Red Dye No. 40, which in Europe comes with the unencouraging warning label: “May have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.”

It’s hard to shake the feeling that synthetic dyes are just the tip of a very large and very troubling iceberg.

Fourth of July sale
Limited Time Offer
Celebrate 250 years with $25 off an annual subscription.
Already have an account? Sign in
To read this article, sign in or subscribe
Joshua Lachter
Joshua Lachter is the co-founder and chief business officer of Synonym, a financing and development platform for biomanufacturing.
Tags:
Health
MAHA
Comments
Comments are closed. The conversation isn’t. Keep it going in The Free Press Forum.
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

No posts

For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersForumShopPodcastsVideoEvents
Download the app
Download on the Google Play Store
©2026 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice