The Free Press
NewslettersSign InSubscribe
New Life for San Francisco’s Worst Idea
Protesters shut down the part of the Bay Bridge toward San Francisco, California, on June 14, 2020, after the death of George Floyd. (Chris Tuite/ImageSPACE/MediaPunch/IPX)
The city wants to give $5M to every black resident affected by discrimination. Seriously?
By Sanjana Friedman
01.13.26 — California
--:--
--:--
Upgrade to Listen
5 mins
Produced by ElevenLabs using AI narration
50
46

Why did San Francisco mayor Daniel Lurie, whose campaign platform emphasized sensible fiscal policy, sign legislation shortly before Christmas to create a “reparations fund” for black residents of the city? The measure was initially drafted during the tenure of Lurie’s predecessor, London Breed, at the request of the city’s African American Reparations Advisory Committee (AARAC), a small group of activists convened soon after the George Floyd riots to propose remedies for past injustices against the local black community. The committee’s almost 400-page list of final recommendations included financing “comprehensive debt forgiveness,” $500,000 down payment loan assistance grants, and—most notoriously—a reparations fund offering a “one-time, lump-sum payment of $5 million” for every qualifying black resident of the city.

Ends tomorrow: We’re celebrating a new year and new additions to our newsroom. Enjoy 20 percent off a subscription to The Free Press.

Get 20% off

In a press release, Lurie emphasized that the legislation did not actually allocate any money to the fund and said he was signing the bill merely “in recognition” of AARAC’s work and of the Board of Supervisors’ unanimous vote in support of the fund. The statement suggested that he was unaware of the broader context of cronyism from which the reparations push emerged. Yet in fact, on the campaign trail, Lurie levied multiple bracing attacks on then-mayor Breed for enabling “blatant corruption” through precisely this kind of identity-based grant program.


Read
What Happened When One Illinois Town Passed Reparations

The point Lurie made back then stands. As I reported at the time, the Breed administration funneled nearly $100 million a year to a handful of activist-staffed departments that functioned largely as make-work and vote-buying schemes. I called it the city’s “DEI-industrial complex.” These city-funded fiefdoms included AARAC, but also the city’s Human Rights Commission, Department on the Status of Women, Office of Transgender Initiatives, and Office of Racial Equity. Under Breed, these departments ran programs offering thousands of dollars in monthly “guaranteed income” payments for select people who identify as black or transgender, with plans to expand to other groups, such as women with criminal records.

Continue Reading The Free Press
To support our journalism, and unlock all of our investigative stories and provocative commentary about the world as it actually is, subscribe below.
Annual
$8.33/month
Billed as $100 yearly
Save 17%!
Monthly
$10/month
Billed as $10 monthly
Already have an account?
Sign In
To read this article, sign in or subscribe
Sanjana Friedman
Sanjana Friedman is a writer and researcher at Y Combinator, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and a contributing editor of City Journal.
Tags:
Progressives
Democrats
San Francisco
Comments
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

No posts

For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersShopPodcastsVideoEvents
Download the app
Download on the Google Play Store
©2026 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice