User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Kevin Durant?'s avatar

It stipulated that the couple she was carrying for would have the final say over “reductions”—which is surrogacy-speak for abortion. “I’m a pro-life surrogate,” Mareko told me. “I was heartbroken, but I had to walk away.”

———————————————————-

LOL ‘reductions’. Modern Democrats are nothing more than Joseph Goebbels with a thesaurus.

At least now we know you can just sign away your basic human right to abortion via DocuSign. So restricting abortion will literally kill people *but also* you can sign a contract with someone you met on Craigslist that gives your sacred right to abortion to them. Talk about unsafe working conditions. Someone call OSHA.

Expand full comment
Unwoke in Idaho's avatar

I wonder if that contract could be enforceable. Oh I’m sure there would be a judge that would allow it, but short of imprisoning the surrogate and cutting the baby out in an abattoir (ie planned parenthood) how would one enforce it. Hey yiu didn’t kill the child when I told you to so you have to pay me back?

Expand full comment
Mike Eyre's avatar

There will be, in the next 5 years, a major lawsuit where a surrogate refuses to abort the baby she's carrying and the Court forces her to do it anyway.

Expand full comment
Lynne Morris's avatar

I cannot like this but I fear you are correct.

Expand full comment
LonesomePolecat's avatar

You have nailed again.

Expand full comment
Kevin Durant?'s avatar

The pro-surrogacy people need to work on their agitprop. Next time there is a school shooting the pro-surrogacy people should say

“Surrogacy doesn’t kill people. Guns kill people.”

That’s literally what the transvestite industry just did after one of their clients massacred a church full of kids.

Expand full comment