The article titled "Is AI the End of the World or the Beginning of a New One?" published on The FP argues that the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not predetermined, and its impact on society will depend on how it is developed and used. The author notes that while AI has the potential to transform many aspects of our lives, including healthcare, transportation, and education, it also raises concerns about job displacement, privacy, and security.
The article highlights the importance of designing AI systems with ethical considerations in mind, such as transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. The author argues that AI should be developed in a way that benefits everyone, not just a select few, and that policymakers should work to ensure that AI is not used to further exacerbate existing social inequalities.
The article also discusses the potential risks of AI, such as the development of autonomous weapons and the possibility of superintelligence. The author emphasizes the need for policymakers and researchers to work together to address these risks and ensure that AI is developed in a way that benefits society as a whole.
In conclusion, the article suggests that the future of AI is not predetermined, and that it is up to us to shape it in a way that benefits everyone. The author calls on policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders to work together to develop AI in a way that is ethical, responsible, and beneficial to society.
Thanks for that reference. This was my first time signing up for and using the ChatGPT directly (i.e., outside of its implementation in Bing). I thought the article summary was reasonable; however I should have requested bullet points.
It (ChatGPT) did flunk the first question I asked: "What's the link to sign in to ChatGPT?"
Its response was non-responsive: "As an AI language model, there is no sign-in required to use ChatGPT. You can simply start asking questions or giving prompts, and I will respond to the best of my abilities. If you're asking about signing in to a specific application or platform that uses ChatGPT as its language model, please provide more details and I will do my best to assist you."
When I submitted negate feedback, telling it the answer should have been "https://chat.openai.com," it just produced another version of the same stuff.
Is there a ChatGPT bullet point version of this TFP?
Asking for a friend....
If we do it right, TFP would no longer be needed ЁЯШ╡тАНЁЯТл.
Bite thy tongue, knave.
That would be a sad day indeed
ЁЯШЖ
Just did it:
The article titled "Is AI the End of the World or the Beginning of a New One?" published on The FP argues that the future of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is not predetermined, and its impact on society will depend on how it is developed and used. The author notes that while AI has the potential to transform many aspects of our lives, including healthcare, transportation, and education, it also raises concerns about job displacement, privacy, and security.
The article highlights the importance of designing AI systems with ethical considerations in mind, such as transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. The author argues that AI should be developed in a way that benefits everyone, not just a select few, and that policymakers should work to ensure that AI is not used to further exacerbate existing social inequalities.
The article also discusses the potential risks of AI, such as the development of autonomous weapons and the possibility of superintelligence. The author emphasizes the need for policymakers and researchers to work together to address these risks and ensure that AI is developed in a way that benefits society as a whole.
In conclusion, the article suggests that the future of AI is not predetermined, and that it is up to us to shape it in a way that benefits everyone. The author calls on policymakers, researchers, and industry leaders to work together to develop AI in a way that is ethical, responsible, and beneficial to society.
You might like this:
"ChatGPT, Lobster Gizzards, and Intelligence... Chat knows more, gizzards are more complex, youтАЩre more intelligent."
https://quillette.com/2023/05/01/chatgpt-lobster-gizzards-and-intelligence/?ref=quillette-daily-newsletter
Thanks for that reference. This was my first time signing up for and using the ChatGPT directly (i.e., outside of its implementation in Bing). I thought the article summary was reasonable; however I should have requested bullet points.
It (ChatGPT) did flunk the first question I asked: "What's the link to sign in to ChatGPT?"
Its response was non-responsive: "As an AI language model, there is no sign-in required to use ChatGPT. You can simply start asking questions or giving prompts, and I will respond to the best of my abilities. If you're asking about signing in to a specific application or platform that uses ChatGPT as its language model, please provide more details and I will do my best to assist you."
When I submitted negate feedback, telling it the answer should have been "https://chat.openai.com," it just produced another version of the same stuff.
Yep, that's why you're way smarter than Chat!
Sorry, source would be https://chat.openai.com