Commenting has been turned off for this post
S C's avatar

I submitted the "Book with ChatGPT" to a pastor and critical user of Claude. Here is part of "their" response.

Pastor: "This is a very interesting article for all the wrong reasons; it illustrates perfectly the inability of most people (both the author and the ‘converted’ people in the crowd), to reason.... The author says ‘he has not coveted his neighbors Ox for years’. That misses the point of the commandment completely. If he's willing to say ‘I haven’t coveted anything for years’ , that would be a different story; it would also be a lie.... His comment would make a great example of logical fallacy... The question is built on an optimistic humanism that Reformed theology has been critiquing, with good reason, for five centuries."

Claude's "Summary of Fallacies" within the article:

Loaded/Complex Question

Circular Reasoning (conclusion embedded in premise)

Appeal to Consensus

Naturalistic Fallacy

False Anthropology

Pastor: The author is right about one thing; AI can be useful

Herodotus II's avatar

I'm finally getting to understand Bari's TFP/CBS ideological tradeoff: CBS gets a Left rub, while TFP wipes the Right! THAT'S why, except for a few paragraphs in TGIF, most of the dailies push the democrat line. Okay, got it...

69 more comments...

No posts