These recommendations are reasonable as alternative strategies, but none of them address the thesis question: how to protect science from COVID politics. COVID did not destroy science; it revealed how corrupt science has become. Better COVID strategies are indeed necessary, but they are likely to be infeasible unless and until politics i…
These recommendations are reasonable as alternative strategies, but none of them address the thesis question: how to protect science from COVID politics. COVID did not destroy science; it revealed how corrupt science has become. Better COVID strategies are indeed necessary, but they are likely to be infeasible unless and until politics is removed from science.
I suggest reducing government funding by 90%. That’s what politicized science.
These recommendations are reasonable as alternative strategies, but none of them address the thesis question: how to protect science from COVID politics. COVID did not destroy science; it revealed how corrupt science has become. Better COVID strategies are indeed necessary, but they are likely to be infeasible unless and until politics is removed from science.
I suggest reducing government funding by 90%. That’s what politicized science.