This Saturday is International Holocaust Remembrance Day, marking the date Auschwitz-Birkenau was liberated after WWII. And it comes at a time when we are seeing a new kind of Holocaust denial: 32 percent of my peers deny that Hamas’s attack against Israel on October 7 even happened.
This despite the fact the terrorist group filmed its own murder spree. Journalists worldwide have watched and reported on a 45-minute film of Hamas’s invasion that shows burned babies, bloodied corpses, and indiscriminate death.
I recently spoke to Dani Dayan, chairman of Yad Vashem, as he made a trip to the U.S. in the wake of Hamas’s rampage. I started our conversation by asking him about what the past can teach us about the present.
What parallels are you seeing between the Holocaust and today?
We are already seeing people denying the atrocities of October 7. . . although they are quite well documented by the perpetrators themselves.
Antisemitism is again becoming a terrible scourge. So I came here to speak with college administrators, especially with Ivy League college presidents and provosts, to alert them. And also to meet with students, to encourage them. Antisemitism is a phenomenon that, if it is not confronted when it starts, can develop into a monstrosity. Empirically, it is the most lethal, the most deadly, form of racism humanity ever knew.
It’s time to ring the bells. It is time to say, especially to academics, that institutions have crossed the line, that it is becoming very dangerous. If antisemitism is not reined in, not defeated on campus, it will be bad for the Jews, but it will be disastrous for the university. It will ruin academia in this country. It will become, instead of a source of pride, a source of shame.
Yad Vashem’s aim is to archive, in every way possible, proof of what happened to the Jews during the Holocaust. Can you describe the lengths you go to?
We are approaching, unfortunately but inevitably, the post-survivors era. Even those that are alive today were children during the shoah. I’m quite sure that when that point in time arrives, when there are no survivors, that will be the “happy hour” of the deniers and the distortionists.
We are in a race against the calendar to take more and more testimonies—and we have tens of thousands of testimonies. But I never forget for a moment that there were six million Jews that never had the privilege of being seated in front of a camera or a tape recorder or a typewriter, and so the documents we can find about them are their memories. The Nazis took the persona away from the Jews. By collecting or registering the evidence about every aspect of life of the victims, we get them back.
Have you seen how you’ve been able to change people’s minds as a result of your work?
One of the relatively good pieces of news is that outright Holocaust denial is not on the rise. On the contrary, it is diminishing. In the ’80s and the ’90s, there were pseudo-intellectuals that denied the Holocaust. I think that today, except for leaders in Iran and probably a few other places, no serious person will deny that the Holocaust happened.
But I think the very serious problem today is Holocaust distortion and trivialization, much more than outright denial. Holocaust distortion is so dangerous because in most cases it is promoted either by governments or by very strong political and social forces. And it goes like this: “Of course the Holocaust happened, and it was terrible, but in my country the entire population helped the Jews.” And obviously that’s a fallacy.
That is why we invest so much in registering the names of the victims. You can’t imagine how painstaking the process was to register almost five million individual names of victims of the Holocaust. Only half of them come from full pages of testimony. But the other half comes from research, from searching archives all over the world, from taking precarious aircrafts to remote Russian archives to find two more names and things like that. That’s the way you confront denial.
The way to confront denialism is by showing the facts. There is no magic.
Francesca Block is a reporter for The Free Press. Follow her on Twitter (now X) @FrancescaABlock.
To support our work, become a Free Press subscriber today:
When the educational system stopped teaching critical thinking and began indoctrinating students, one consequence is that many of these students began thinking of themselves as uniquely enlightened. They consider themselves the ultimate in human evolution.
This gives them no sense of history. You see this in the novels that win literature prizes. You see this on the political stage and you see this rewarded on college campuses. They imagine themselves as somehow far superior to anyone who lived in times past. They judge instead of learn.
As a result, they don't have the capacity for empathy or understanding. Their world view is simple and based on race and sexuality. They cannot imagine the world as it was at any time in the past. And they cannot imagine the world in the future - when people will probably point out this time in history and come to regard it as a return to the dark ages in many ways.
This is the opposite of what Jewish culture emphasizes. I think this is a big part of why antisemitism has grown so much. Not that long ago, Jewish culture aligned with the progressives and the universities (once the quotas on Jewish enrollment and professorships ended). Now that liberalism is dead, that's all gone.
It's important to document history. I fear, however, that no amount of documentation will persuade the indoctrinated that their world view is misguided. They have too much trust in the institutions that have programmed their ignorance and hate. For them, challenging their world view is like asking them to take a bite from the apple of the tree of critical thinking.
Progressives often cite this arc of progress they see in history to proclaim they are on the “right side of history.” Therefore whatever insane thing they want to do is justified. I wonder what it is going to be like for them when their kids or grandkids grow up to regard them as racists. Although to be frank I don’t think progressives are a group of people that are having kids.
It is comforting in that sense that there is an end to their ideology in sight. They are a childless group whose views will die with them. There is this creepy recognition of that which is why they try to indoctrinate other peoples kids in school. But I think they will lose that fight in the long run.