Share this comment
I continue to subscribe to this for a variety of reasons but it's stories like "how BLM blew $90M" that make we wonder. Like why give space for this "story" given the facts were known almost as soon as actblue.org started re-directing donations from kids at my Church that they thought were going to BLM or m4bl.org in 2020. This all went …
I continue to subscribe to this for a variety of reasons but it's stories like "how BLM blew $90M" that make we wonder. Like why give space for this "story" given the facts were known almost as soon as ActBlue.org started re-directing donations from kids at my Church that they thought were going to BLM or https://m4bl.org/ in 2020. This all went down in the summer of love and documented and so what is new in 2024? What Emily and every other dem author misses, conveniently, is that when kids and bleeding hearts donated back in 2020 because of George Floyd, the fine print on the BLM web donation page (run by ActBlue) clearly noted that "all, a portion, or none" (paraphrased) of the donation would go to BLM or m4bl.org. But who read that fine print? Who even cared that the jump page for payment was managed by ActBlue? So about $1B went to ActBlue (dems fundraising) and the URL on the donation page ended in "/actblue.com" and BLM got $90M and Opal and her buddies ("we're trained Marxists" they noted on a video) bought houses and paid themselves well. So the dems raised about $1B off the back of a convicted felon and drug user who was martyred. That is the story. I mean how much law-fare "can" you do if you have an extra $B sitting around?