I've found this a very hard issue to get clear in my mind, but you've nailed from the pragmatist's angle (which happens to be mine). Without proper care, you will get a 'lawyer's picnic' for no public benefit. Who would benefit from that? (Rhetorical question- we know who would benefit).
I've found this a very hard issue to get clear in my mind, but you've nailed from the pragmatist's angle (which happens to be mine). Without proper care, you will get a 'lawyer's picnic' for no public benefit. Who would benefit from that? (Rhetorical question- we know who would benefit).
I've found this a very hard issue to get clear in my mind, but you've nailed from the pragmatist's angle (which happens to be mine). Without proper care, you will get a 'lawyer's picnic' for no public benefit. Who would benefit from that? (Rhetorical question- we know who would benefit).