You’re spot on. As a parent of 2 young kids, I am now questioning every childhood vaccine presented to us at the pediatrician’s office. I am now fearful of nearly every additive in the “essential” vaccines, as I have zero confidence in the Covid vaccine. The CDC seems to be incredibly corrupt.
You’re spot on. As a parent of 2 young kids, I am now questioning every childhood vaccine presented to us at the pediatrician’s office. I am now fearful of nearly every additive in the “essential” vaccines, as I have zero confidence in the Covid vaccine. The CDC seems to be incredibly corrupt.
You're right - they are lucky. They might get Chickenpox, but at least they won't be filled with aluminum, mercury and monkey tissue. Most parents don't do any research prior to blindly injecting their children with toxins. Do your own research before you judge :) Have a nice day!
Why do I suspect that "your own research" is reading your Facebook feed as opposed to controlled studies in your basement? Why do people think that Googling and reading results that agree with their preconceived ideas counts as "research"?
Maybe we should leave the "research" to actual researchers. But I'm sure you know WAY better. Hopefully your kids will grow up to be more critical thinkers than their mom.
I have read multiple books, scientific studies, and listened to 100+ hours of podcasts by well-known and respected doctors and scientists. Additionally, I have used the NIH and CDC websites as resources. I also have a wonderful new MD who believes in certain vaccines and knows others are not worth the risk. Bet you're someone who just complies and doesn't bother to ask any questions because the CDC and your doc "know what's best for you". Ah, to live in such blissful ignorance. Must be nice!
Did you know there is currently a class action lawsuit against the makers of Tylenol? There is now evidence (30+ years later) that it can cause Autism in utero. Betcha haven't heard about that one yet! Its a big world out there... much for us ALL to learn! Science is never settled.
"don't trust the CDC"..."i used the CDC websites as resources". Make up your mind. "Scientific studies"? Please - if that were true, you wouldn't be getting in arguments on the internet - you'd have better things to do with your time, Doctor.
Also, there's ALWAYS a class-action lawsuit against everyone; that's how lawyers make money - by tricking stupid people into thinking they'll get free money if they make a a claim against a big company. Also, LOL at "Tylenol causes autism". According to nutjobs like you, EVERYTHING causes autism.
Life has risks. If you think that a small number of negative outcomes invalidates overwhelming benefits of scientific progress then you're not a very critical thinker. Why do all you brilliant people who are so quick to look for examples of negative outcomes in medical science not cease driving your cars the moment you see a story about a fatal crash on the highway? Seems that your "think, don't believe" approach only applies to things that don't agree with your ideology. Unfortunately, I doubt that you are better than that.
So your proposal is for scientists to hold back on their vaccinations for, say, 20-30 years until they've done studies on the effects that would satisfy you? Or should it be longer? And in the meantime, if someone contract a disease that could have been mitigated by the vaccine, that's too bad for them. Because J Campbell isn't satisfied.
Scientists in the US have done too well - they've literally made the diseases they protect against no longer threatening. Funny how people were literally lining up for vaccines when they were introduced in the mid-1900s because they had REAL experiences with the diseases these vaccines protected against. Then just a few generations later, morons like you make baseless claims about risk then insist that there's danger in vaccines because no one cares to prove you wrong.
Dragging out random, extremely rare risks doesn't count as "evidence". As far as acts of Congress and remunerations, that would be like saying that because Congress set up a fund to repay the victims of 9/11, that's proof that buildings are risky and should be avoided. Go look up the Injury Act; it was a PR move to calm people who were spooked by made-up stories about vaccine injuries. It's a shame, because when it was passed, it probably seemed like the easiest thing in the world - promise to compensate "victims" of something that happens so rarely that it will cost virtually nothing. Little did they know that loonies like you would come along 35 years later and take it as "proof" of some grand conspiracy to cover up and "silence" the overwhelming number of vaccine-injured (LOL) children.
I'll just say "you're welcome" on behalf of all the people like me who get vaccinated so people like you can avoid serious disease despite your bullheaded ignorance about how this whole thing works.
You're smart to be skeptical. People need to wake up to the likelihood that the spectacular corruption circus we've witnessed with the Covid vax is not in its first run; this is the Pharma playbook in action, just newly laid bare for the public to see.
There is so much I respect about Vinay Prasad's courage in taking on the Pharma-funded regulatory/medical establishment cabal over this vaccine, but his final paragraph shows he has not looked into the facts surrounding the supposed "fraud" of the Wakefield et al study, namely that its linking of the MMR to autism appeared as a single comment in the conclusion of their brief (five page) paper. The 13 authors, who were investigating the health issues of kids with autism and had noted what appeared to be a new bowel disorder in such children, included a statement (after much internal debate) that most parents reported that the symptoms first appeared after the MMR, and the authors recommended further investigation of this claim. That was it. It was NOT a "deeply flawed" study about autism and MMR, which is what most people believe thanks to the media and medical complex's crucifixion of Wakefield, at Pharma's behest.
There are many many more details of the story, but the main point is: we now know how effectively the cabal can spread lies and propaganda to take down, sideline, or annihilate the career of anyone who threatens their power and profits. Wakefield and his co-authors didn't have the benefit of social media channels through which to defend themselves and the facts, but now that such channels exist we are seeing the cabal's recent victims being revealed, as facts leak through to expose the lies.
I wish Prasad would extend his skepticism and curiosity to question whether this level of corruption and incompetence is really a new phenomenon that's only emerged with Covid. Because that really isn't a strong probability when you consider that every major Pharma company has paid out multiple millions in fraud damages for dangerous products they got on the market through misrepresentations of safety (and the assistance of their cronies in the regulatory process). In fact, it ONLY makes sense if we trust that these companies have placed all their ethical people in their indemnified vaccine divisions, where lawsuits cannot compel discovery of fraud claims.
Yes. That last paragraph pretty much ruined his essay. It was completely unnecessary to his other, valid points, imo. He showed his pro-vax-at-all-costs-and-don’t-look-too-close self. He’s made an exception with covid shots, but that’s it. Oh well, gotta start somewhere, and I’ve noticed that there are quite a few folks on the comments that are likely learning some new things! That’s a good thing!
To this point re: liability, I have seen mentioned (whispered, rather, because 2022...) that the CV vax-makers will only benefit from the liability shield IF it's added to the childhood schedule. I (we all) should look into this.
Yep. Everyone is scratching their heads, wondering why they've pushed this shot so hard for kids, who are at significantly higher risk for adverse events from it than they are for any complications from Covid. The answer is: they need to get it on the kids schedule in order to maintain liability for the manufacturers after FDA approval (which they've essentially succeeded in doing, since the ACIP just voted 15-0 last week to recommend the shot be added to the CDC's adult AND KIDS vaccine schedules). This is also why Cominarity was not available/used in the U.S. after its approval; everyone in America was still given the EUA version because that's the product that still had liability protection for Pfizer. The entire trajectory from the outset of these shots has been to get them on the CDC childhood schedule and thereby protect the profits for the manufacturers.
You’re spot on. As a parent of 2 young kids, I am now questioning every childhood vaccine presented to us at the pediatrician’s office. I am now fearful of nearly every additive in the “essential” vaccines, as I have zero confidence in the Covid vaccine. The CDC seems to be incredibly corrupt.
So you're risking your children's health because you don't understand science? Got it. They're lucky to have you.
You're right - they are lucky. They might get Chickenpox, but at least they won't be filled with aluminum, mercury and monkey tissue. Most parents don't do any research prior to blindly injecting their children with toxins. Do your own research before you judge :) Have a nice day!
"do your own research"
Why do I suspect that "your own research" is reading your Facebook feed as opposed to controlled studies in your basement? Why do people think that Googling and reading results that agree with their preconceived ideas counts as "research"?
Maybe we should leave the "research" to actual researchers. But I'm sure you know WAY better. Hopefully your kids will grow up to be more critical thinkers than their mom.
I have read multiple books, scientific studies, and listened to 100+ hours of podcasts by well-known and respected doctors and scientists. Additionally, I have used the NIH and CDC websites as resources. I also have a wonderful new MD who believes in certain vaccines and knows others are not worth the risk. Bet you're someone who just complies and doesn't bother to ask any questions because the CDC and your doc "know what's best for you". Ah, to live in such blissful ignorance. Must be nice!
Did you know there is currently a class action lawsuit against the makers of Tylenol? There is now evidence (30+ years later) that it can cause Autism in utero. Betcha haven't heard about that one yet! Its a big world out there... much for us ALL to learn! Science is never settled.
"don't trust the CDC"..."i used the CDC websites as resources". Make up your mind. "Scientific studies"? Please - if that were true, you wouldn't be getting in arguments on the internet - you'd have better things to do with your time, Doctor.
Also, there's ALWAYS a class-action lawsuit against everyone; that's how lawyers make money - by tricking stupid people into thinking they'll get free money if they make a a claim against a big company. Also, LOL at "Tylenol causes autism". According to nutjobs like you, EVERYTHING causes autism.
I think your 4th Covid jab is causing some neuro issues….
Life has risks. If you think that a small number of negative outcomes invalidates overwhelming benefits of scientific progress then you're not a very critical thinker. Why do all you brilliant people who are so quick to look for examples of negative outcomes in medical science not cease driving your cars the moment you see a story about a fatal crash on the highway? Seems that your "think, don't believe" approach only applies to things that don't agree with your ideology. Unfortunately, I doubt that you are better than that.
So your proposal is for scientists to hold back on their vaccinations for, say, 20-30 years until they've done studies on the effects that would satisfy you? Or should it be longer? And in the meantime, if someone contract a disease that could have been mitigated by the vaccine, that's too bad for them. Because J Campbell isn't satisfied.
Scientists in the US have done too well - they've literally made the diseases they protect against no longer threatening. Funny how people were literally lining up for vaccines when they were introduced in the mid-1900s because they had REAL experiences with the diseases these vaccines protected against. Then just a few generations later, morons like you make baseless claims about risk then insist that there's danger in vaccines because no one cares to prove you wrong.
Dragging out random, extremely rare risks doesn't count as "evidence". As far as acts of Congress and remunerations, that would be like saying that because Congress set up a fund to repay the victims of 9/11, that's proof that buildings are risky and should be avoided. Go look up the Injury Act; it was a PR move to calm people who were spooked by made-up stories about vaccine injuries. It's a shame, because when it was passed, it probably seemed like the easiest thing in the world - promise to compensate "victims" of something that happens so rarely that it will cost virtually nothing. Little did they know that loonies like you would come along 35 years later and take it as "proof" of some grand conspiracy to cover up and "silence" the overwhelming number of vaccine-injured (LOL) children.
I'll just say "you're welcome" on behalf of all the people like me who get vaccinated so people like you can avoid serious disease despite your bullheaded ignorance about how this whole thing works.
You're smart to be skeptical. People need to wake up to the likelihood that the spectacular corruption circus we've witnessed with the Covid vax is not in its first run; this is the Pharma playbook in action, just newly laid bare for the public to see.
There is so much I respect about Vinay Prasad's courage in taking on the Pharma-funded regulatory/medical establishment cabal over this vaccine, but his final paragraph shows he has not looked into the facts surrounding the supposed "fraud" of the Wakefield et al study, namely that its linking of the MMR to autism appeared as a single comment in the conclusion of their brief (five page) paper. The 13 authors, who were investigating the health issues of kids with autism and had noted what appeared to be a new bowel disorder in such children, included a statement (after much internal debate) that most parents reported that the symptoms first appeared after the MMR, and the authors recommended further investigation of this claim. That was it. It was NOT a "deeply flawed" study about autism and MMR, which is what most people believe thanks to the media and medical complex's crucifixion of Wakefield, at Pharma's behest.
There are many many more details of the story, but the main point is: we now know how effectively the cabal can spread lies and propaganda to take down, sideline, or annihilate the career of anyone who threatens their power and profits. Wakefield and his co-authors didn't have the benefit of social media channels through which to defend themselves and the facts, but now that such channels exist we are seeing the cabal's recent victims being revealed, as facts leak through to expose the lies.
I wish Prasad would extend his skepticism and curiosity to question whether this level of corruption and incompetence is really a new phenomenon that's only emerged with Covid. Because that really isn't a strong probability when you consider that every major Pharma company has paid out multiple millions in fraud damages for dangerous products they got on the market through misrepresentations of safety (and the assistance of their cronies in the regulatory process). In fact, it ONLY makes sense if we trust that these companies have placed all their ethical people in their indemnified vaccine divisions, where lawsuits cannot compel discovery of fraud claims.
Yes. That last paragraph pretty much ruined his essay. It was completely unnecessary to his other, valid points, imo. He showed his pro-vax-at-all-costs-and-don’t-look-too-close self. He’s made an exception with covid shots, but that’s it. Oh well, gotta start somewhere, and I’ve noticed that there are quite a few folks on the comments that are likely learning some new things! That’s a good thing!
Don’t go down the rabbit hole of aluminum adjuvant.
To this point re: liability, I have seen mentioned (whispered, rather, because 2022...) that the CV vax-makers will only benefit from the liability shield IF it's added to the childhood schedule. I (we all) should look into this.
Yep. Everyone is scratching their heads, wondering why they've pushed this shot so hard for kids, who are at significantly higher risk for adverse events from it than they are for any complications from Covid. The answer is: they need to get it on the kids schedule in order to maintain liability for the manufacturers after FDA approval (which they've essentially succeeded in doing, since the ACIP just voted 15-0 last week to recommend the shot be added to the CDC's adult AND KIDS vaccine schedules). This is also why Cominarity was not available/used in the U.S. after its approval; everyone in America was still given the EUA version because that's the product that still had liability protection for Pfizer. The entire trajectory from the outset of these shots has been to get them on the CDC childhood schedule and thereby protect the profits for the manufacturers.