“...which, among many changes, expressly disavowed any theological basis for antisemitism.” This is disingenuous reporting. How does this better inform the reader? You are poisoning the well. I expect reporting of this caliber from Fox and CNN. This implication is egregious and disgusting, to imply that traditionalists would in any way h…
“...which, among many changes, expressly disavowed any theological basis for antisemitism.” This is disingenuous reporting. How does this better inform the reader? You are poisoning the well. I expect reporting of this caliber from Fox and CNN. This implication is egregious and disgusting, to imply that traditionalists would in any way have a soft stance on antisemitism is garbage. A call to tradition is not by necessity a call to backwards thinking.
“...which, among many changes, expressly disavowed any theological basis for antisemitism.” This is disingenuous reporting. How does this better inform the reader? You are poisoning the well. I expect reporting of this caliber from Fox and CNN. This implication is egregious and disgusting, to imply that traditionalists would in any way have a soft stance on antisemitism is garbage. A call to tradition is not by necessity a call to backwards thinking.
Suzy has had some decent pieces, but this is an absolute CLUNKER.