This is by design you know. Watch just who is funding all the immigration, its Soros, the wealthiest fund manager ever. The guy who ran hedge funds from somewhere in the Caribbean where the clients names are hidden by law. This is the guy who broke the UK pound.
What is his next move? I'm pretty certain it involves Klaus Schwab, who is pu…
This is by design you know. Watch just who is funding all the immigration, its Soros, the wealthiest fund manager ever. The guy who ran hedge funds from somewhere in the Caribbean where the clients names are hidden by law. This is the guy who broke the UK pound.
What is his next move? I'm pretty certain it involves Klaus Schwab, who is pushing for The Great Reset, after which: the useless people will own nothing, live in a 15 minute city, eat ze bugs, and be happy.
What stands in the way of The Great Reset? The UK, USA, Canada, other free thinking nations. How to break their backs, just flood them with lawless people funded on public funds, breaking the governments financially, disproportionate policing to break the people's trust of government.
What is the end goal? According to Klaus Schwab, in The Great Reset, we'll replace democratic stakeholders with financial stakeholders. Which I take to mean, we'll replace democratic leadership selection with corporate leadership. Thus, I see this as global socialism, where we'll have a union of soviets, which will really be a union of corporations running the global economy. But first the only obstacles standing in the way need to be removed, and that is freedom loving people of the US and UK.
I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing (I can't stand Soros). But, my question is, why? What's the real motivation here? I ask because ... I'm trying to get a sense for how this theory would/could relate to an average Joe without them simply passing us off as "conspiracy theorists."
Because in a vacuum, what you're saying could sound rational. But, what's the human component here? Soros is an old man and will be dead soon - where's his motivation for uprooting the whole of western civilization? His son will be taking up the reigns soon, but he too is simply a mortal man that will one day die. I'm just trying to understand (if what you say is true) why someone would go through that trouble to build their legacy on such toxic ideologies?
Is it all purely greed, is it truly that simple? Again, not saying it's not, I'm just also looking for the soft underbellies of their will vs the purely hard, tangibles of economics.
The answer is blatantly obvious to me but I'll spell it out anyway. Power. The world used to run on slavery, and in many places still does. Western Civilization has thrived on the Judeo-Christian concept of individual responsibility - distribution of power (as in autonomy) as widely as possible. People making their own decisions and being responsible for the outcome of those decisions, good or bad. Think about it. True freedom is being able to make a choice and reap the rewards or penalty of that choice. Contrast that with systems where all the power is sucked upwards into a cabal, or leadership oligarchy or simply a dictator. That's intoxicating if you are that leader. Kim Jong Il has the intoxicating ability to control every single one of NK's 25 million inhabitants, even controlling their emotions. The Left believe in a utopian vision where an establishment elite can make all the important decisions for the whole world. Standing in the way are people who want to make their own decisions where and how they live. Those people can be crushed by the government if they are tagged as insurrectionists rather than dissenters.
George Soros is literally 93 years old - what type of "power" is he going to have in a year or so? Again, as I said, yes, of course we can talk about the "blatantly obvious" concepts behind these types of political maneuvers like money and power - but I'm trying to find evidence of a deeper meaning. What's the 'human condition' aspect behind this? You can't take money and power to the grave, and at the end of the day all you have is your legacy. And why you would want to go down in history as someone ushering in anti-utopian hellscapes - well - that's just beyond my comprehension. Maybe Soros is just ignorant of the history behind said ideologies? I don't know.....
I think you underestimate the intoxication of power for its own sake - but for Soros, it's spending his billions to "make a difference". Utopians don't think they will make a hellscape. It may be ignorance, but it's willful ignorance. The desire to be king over the earth is adopted sincerely as being in the best interests of the peasants. It was always thus. Behind this pride is a spiritual evil that seeks the destruction of all that is good and holy. Jesus Christ called him the Father of Lies. He is the author of humans seeking power over the earth, and he often manifests his control over others as 'higher wisdom'.
Maybe I just don't get it, because "power" sounds awful. Spiderman was right, with great power comes great responsibility. Eek, who the hell wants that? I'd much rather focus on me and my own and make my own space greater, as well as those around me. I'm an atheist so the religious angle has no bearing on me (other than render onto Cesar what is Cesar's).
But I do think if Soros is so unbelievably myopic to not be able to see what his influence has wrought (which should be clear in any inner-city) than the guy is either truly evil or beyond stupid.
I see Soros' motivation as purely his love of the technical aspect. Being an old hacker, there is nothing I love more than to spin an elegant hack. Soros' career was to manipulate markets to enrich his clients. He started out learning to successfully manipulate security's, then entire markets, then entire economies, now he manipulates entire populations ... that's his elegant hack.
There are a lot of people who believe the ultimate goal of mankind is a global socialist government ala Marx. Me, I think this is stifling, whatever. People have their various beliefs on socialism. There are of course people who aspire to control governments, again not me, but there are people who aspire to this goal. Likewise there are people who aspire to lead global socialist governments and they'll stop at nothing to see their goals fulfilled.
Why??? Just today I started reading Ted Kaczynski's manifesto—yes thats the Unabomber's Manifesto—and it is a surprisingly good read. He starts out explaining human motivations, that once securing food, shelter, & clothing became easy, mankind aspires to more, and requires a surrogate activity in which to strive.
This is by design you know. Watch just who is funding all the immigration, its Soros, the wealthiest fund manager ever. The guy who ran hedge funds from somewhere in the Caribbean where the clients names are hidden by law. This is the guy who broke the UK pound.
What is his next move? I'm pretty certain it involves Klaus Schwab, who is pushing for The Great Reset, after which: the useless people will own nothing, live in a 15 minute city, eat ze bugs, and be happy.
What stands in the way of The Great Reset? The UK, USA, Canada, other free thinking nations. How to break their backs, just flood them with lawless people funded on public funds, breaking the governments financially, disproportionate policing to break the people's trust of government.
What is the end goal? According to Klaus Schwab, in The Great Reset, we'll replace democratic stakeholders with financial stakeholders. Which I take to mean, we'll replace democratic leadership selection with corporate leadership. Thus, I see this as global socialism, where we'll have a union of soviets, which will really be a union of corporations running the global economy. But first the only obstacles standing in the way need to be removed, and that is freedom loving people of the US and UK.
I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing (I can't stand Soros). But, my question is, why? What's the real motivation here? I ask because ... I'm trying to get a sense for how this theory would/could relate to an average Joe without them simply passing us off as "conspiracy theorists."
Because in a vacuum, what you're saying could sound rational. But, what's the human component here? Soros is an old man and will be dead soon - where's his motivation for uprooting the whole of western civilization? His son will be taking up the reigns soon, but he too is simply a mortal man that will one day die. I'm just trying to understand (if what you say is true) why someone would go through that trouble to build their legacy on such toxic ideologies?
Is it all purely greed, is it truly that simple? Again, not saying it's not, I'm just also looking for the soft underbellies of their will vs the purely hard, tangibles of economics.
The answer is blatantly obvious to me but I'll spell it out anyway. Power. The world used to run on slavery, and in many places still does. Western Civilization has thrived on the Judeo-Christian concept of individual responsibility - distribution of power (as in autonomy) as widely as possible. People making their own decisions and being responsible for the outcome of those decisions, good or bad. Think about it. True freedom is being able to make a choice and reap the rewards or penalty of that choice. Contrast that with systems where all the power is sucked upwards into a cabal, or leadership oligarchy or simply a dictator. That's intoxicating if you are that leader. Kim Jong Il has the intoxicating ability to control every single one of NK's 25 million inhabitants, even controlling their emotions. The Left believe in a utopian vision where an establishment elite can make all the important decisions for the whole world. Standing in the way are people who want to make their own decisions where and how they live. Those people can be crushed by the government if they are tagged as insurrectionists rather than dissenters.
George Soros is literally 93 years old - what type of "power" is he going to have in a year or so? Again, as I said, yes, of course we can talk about the "blatantly obvious" concepts behind these types of political maneuvers like money and power - but I'm trying to find evidence of a deeper meaning. What's the 'human condition' aspect behind this? You can't take money and power to the grave, and at the end of the day all you have is your legacy. And why you would want to go down in history as someone ushering in anti-utopian hellscapes - well - that's just beyond my comprehension. Maybe Soros is just ignorant of the history behind said ideologies? I don't know.....
I think you underestimate the intoxication of power for its own sake - but for Soros, it's spending his billions to "make a difference". Utopians don't think they will make a hellscape. It may be ignorance, but it's willful ignorance. The desire to be king over the earth is adopted sincerely as being in the best interests of the peasants. It was always thus. Behind this pride is a spiritual evil that seeks the destruction of all that is good and holy. Jesus Christ called him the Father of Lies. He is the author of humans seeking power over the earth, and he often manifests his control over others as 'higher wisdom'.
Maybe I just don't get it, because "power" sounds awful. Spiderman was right, with great power comes great responsibility. Eek, who the hell wants that? I'd much rather focus on me and my own and make my own space greater, as well as those around me. I'm an atheist so the religious angle has no bearing on me (other than render onto Cesar what is Cesar's).
But I do think if Soros is so unbelievably myopic to not be able to see what his influence has wrought (which should be clear in any inner-city) than the guy is either truly evil or beyond stupid.
I see Soros' motivation as purely his love of the technical aspect. Being an old hacker, there is nothing I love more than to spin an elegant hack. Soros' career was to manipulate markets to enrich his clients. He started out learning to successfully manipulate security's, then entire markets, then entire economies, now he manipulates entire populations ... that's his elegant hack.
There are a lot of people who believe the ultimate goal of mankind is a global socialist government ala Marx. Me, I think this is stifling, whatever. People have their various beliefs on socialism. There are of course people who aspire to control governments, again not me, but there are people who aspire to this goal. Likewise there are people who aspire to lead global socialist governments and they'll stop at nothing to see their goals fulfilled.
Why??? Just today I started reading Ted Kaczynski's manifesto—yes thats the Unabomber's Manifesto—and it is a surprisingly good read. He starts out explaining human motivations, that once securing food, shelter, & clothing became easy, mankind aspires to more, and requires a surrogate activity in which to strive.