You make a good point about the implicit fact that Indians only lost to Europeans because they had inferior weapons and numbers. And as an Indian yourself, you rightly laugh at putting “noble savages” on moral pedestals. That said, you’re the one who needs the world history course. There were only a few thousand Jews in a sea of Palestin…
You make a good point about the implicit fact that Indians only lost to Europeans because they had inferior weapons and numbers. And as an Indian yourself, you rightly laugh at putting “noble savages” on moral pedestals. That said, you’re the one who needs the world history course. There were only a few thousand Jews in a sea of Palestinian Arabs in WWI. Then the Rothchilds caught the Zionist bug, leaned on England to produce the Balfour Declaration, and started shipping Jews to Palestine in the first wave of Zionism’s settler colonialism, which proceeds apace to this day as Jews steal more and more Arab land on the West Bank. There is no question that the Arabs, understandably hating the Jews for having better weapons and richer, more powerful friends, would drink the Jews’ blood if given the chance. Just as the Comanches and Zulus would quaffed the blood of their own equally ruthless conquerors. But the issue before the world today is the same issue before it with South African apartheid, and Israel is losing the battle for the world’s hearts and minds just as the Boers did. This will increasingly be true in America as well as the overwhelmingly Trump and Bibi loving Boomers die off ever faster and are replaced at the polls by all those pesky progressives under 50. Watch the superb Israeli documentary The Gatekeepers (2012 or so) in which six retired former heads of Shin Bet unanimously agree that either Israel works out a two-state solution or it is doomed. You can take it on faith that these guys had all heard all the Jewish arguments about how the lack of two states was all the fault of the Palestinians. They clearly weren’t buying.
You make a good point about the implicit fact that Indians only lost to Europeans because they had inferior weapons and numbers. And as an Indian yourself, you rightly laugh at putting “noble savages” on moral pedestals. That said, you’re the one who needs the world history course. There were only a few thousand Jews in a sea of Palestinian Arabs in WWI. Then the Rothchilds caught the Zionist bug, leaned on England to produce the Balfour Declaration, and started shipping Jews to Palestine in the first wave of Zionism’s settler colonialism, which proceeds apace to this day as Jews steal more and more Arab land on the West Bank. There is no question that the Arabs, understandably hating the Jews for having better weapons and richer, more powerful friends, would drink the Jews’ blood if given the chance. Just as the Comanches and Zulus would quaffed the blood of their own equally ruthless conquerors. But the issue before the world today is the same issue before it with South African apartheid, and Israel is losing the battle for the world’s hearts and minds just as the Boers did. This will increasingly be true in America as well as the overwhelmingly Trump and Bibi loving Boomers die off ever faster and are replaced at the polls by all those pesky progressives under 50. Watch the superb Israeli documentary The Gatekeepers (2012 or so) in which six retired former heads of Shin Bet unanimously agree that either Israel works out a two-state solution or it is doomed. You can take it on faith that these guys had all heard all the Jewish arguments about how the lack of two states was all the fault of the Palestinians. They clearly weren’t buying.
So, for you, Jewish history goes back only to the early 1900's?
That's what I thought? Archeology and written history only start with Balfour?
This gibbering ignoramus shows up here from time to time to embarrass himself. Best to just ignore. He’s desperate for attention.
Thanks, didn't know he was a frequent flier.