I am a learned person myself so I hope disagreement with the erudite Adam Grant's prolix discourse is not mistaken for anti-intellectualism. I'm sorry not sorry but all the data-collection under the impressive label of "meta-analysis" does not in any sense assail the indisputable moral truth that we humans should look upon one another fo…
I am a learned person myself so I hope disagreement with the erudite Adam Grant's prolix discourse is not mistaken for anti-intellectualism. I'm sorry not sorry but all the data-collection under the impressive label of "meta-analysis" does not in any sense assail the indisputable moral truth that we humans should look upon one another for what is in our hearts and character, not for the variegated shades of tan or brown on the surface of the epidermis. In short, Coleman Hughes is 100% correct.
I am a learned person myself so I hope disagreement with the erudite Adam Grant's prolix discourse is not mistaken for anti-intellectualism. I'm sorry not sorry but all the data-collection under the impressive label of "meta-analysis" does not in any sense assail the indisputable moral truth that we humans should look upon one another for what is in our hearts and character, not for the variegated shades of tan or brown on the surface of the epidermis. In short, Coleman Hughes is 100% correct.
What he said.
I like the erudite way in which you expressed this opinion Sir.