I would have to agree that having listened to plenty of Bret Weinstein, it seems awfully familiar the way he’s mischaracterized in so many outlets, even heterodox ones.
I have yet to be convinced of some of his more radical points, but he’s very clear about the distinction between being against vaccines and being cautious about novel mRNA…
I would have to agree that having listened to plenty of Bret Weinstein, it seems awfully familiar the way he’s mischaracterized in so many outlets, even heterodox ones.
I have yet to be convinced of some of his more radical points, but he’s very clear about the distinction between being against vaccines and being cautious about novel mRNA technology, and he’s very pointed about how some of the same derangement he experienced at Evergreen has become mainstream.
He doesn’t have to be a “guru”. You can just listen to him and then think for yourself.
There’s also a significant amount of overlap between Weinstin and Jay Bhattacharya or Vinay Prasad. Not 100%, but listening to this interview (or many others) you wouldn’t know it.
I would have to agree that having listened to plenty of Bret Weinstein, it seems awfully familiar the way he’s mischaracterized in so many outlets, even heterodox ones.
I have yet to be convinced of some of his more radical points, but he’s very clear about the distinction between being against vaccines and being cautious about novel mRNA technology, and he’s very pointed about how some of the same derangement he experienced at Evergreen has become mainstream.
He doesn’t have to be a “guru”. You can just listen to him and then think for yourself.
There’s also a significant amount of overlap between Weinstin and Jay Bhattacharya or Vinay Prasad. Not 100%, but listening to this interview (or many others) you wouldn’t know it.