Last Thursday, Donald Trump became the first president in U.S. history to be convicted of a felony.
As the news broke, cheers reportedly erupted in President Joe Biden’s campaign headquarters. Within minutes, Biden had swooped in for donations on social media: “There’s only one way to keep Donald Trump out of the Oval Office: At the ballot box,” he wrote on X. “Donate to our campaign today.”
But many Americans had a different impression of the Trump verdict: that his conviction was proof of corruption, not justice. And while a snap poll showed that 54 percent of registered voters “strongly” or “somewhat” approved of the guilty verdict, more than a third of voters said they “strongly” or “somewhat” disapproved.
Meanwhile, as media analysts were busy celebrating the verdict, with ABC’s chief White House correspondent calling it a “political gift to Democrats,” searches for “donate to Trump” spiked on Google. So many people were rushing to Trump’s fundraising page that the site temporarily crashed. By the next morning, his campaign announced that nearly $35 million had poured in overnight—almost 30 percent of which appeared to come from first-time Trump donors. By late Friday, the campaign stated that the total had climbed to nearly $53 million.
Who are these sudden supporters? We wanted to find out. Here, seven people tell us how they made the journey from Never Trump to Trump Now.
Shaun Maguire: “The Republican Party is less of a danger to democracy than the Democratic Party right now.”
Maguire, 38, is a Los Angeles–based partner at Sequoia, one of the most well-known venture capital firms in the country. He previously worked at Google, but left in 2019 when he says the company became too “woke.” The married father of two says he’s never voted for a Republican presidential candidate before. In 2016, he donated to Hillary Clinton’s campaign. But within an hour after Thursday’s news, Maguire posted on X that he’d donated $300,000 to Trump—a candidate he says once made him feel “deathly afraid.”
In a 3,500-word essay, he listed his reasons for backing the ex-president, including the Biden administration’s “incompetent” withdrawal from Afghanistan, but the main reason that “boiled my blood,” he wrote, was “the double standards and lawfare that Trump has faced.” The tweet quickly went viral and elicited a response from Elon Musk, who wrote in the replies, “I think you’re right.”
Speaking to The Free Press, Maguire said Trump’s conviction “makes me want to support him even more.” But, he added, “it wasn’t the conviction as much as it was the charges being brought in the first place. These are not democratic tactics being used.
“In 2016, I thought it was likely that Trump was both owned by Russia and that he would be highly corrupt and undemocratic. That made me deathly afraid. But after seeing his actions as president, that foreign influence never seemed to have materialized. I think he was one of the strongest foreign policy presidents we’ve ever had.
“We were told that Donald Trump would be the end of democracy, but it turns out that lawfare tactics have been escalated by the Democrats and not by the Republicans. And so it’s from that backdrop that I believe the Republican Party is less of a danger to democracy than the Democratic Party right now.”
On announcing his support for Trump publicly, Maguire said, “I feel very principled. I’ve done an unbelievable amount of homework and I changed my mind.”
He added that he’s seen a similar political “shift” happening among his Silicon Valley compatriots, a sentiment that’s also being echoed on social media. Even so, he said his own change of heart has surprised many close to him, even himself: “The 2016 version of myself would have hated this version of myself.”
Kate Nitti: “I feel the need to send a message to the Democrats.”
Kate Nitti, 40, is a marketing consultant and a married mother of two now living in New Jersey. A lifelong Democrat, she said she voted solely for her party’s representatives for more than twenty years when she still lived in Brooklyn. But then, in 2021, she marked her ballot for a Republican for the first time—Curtis Sliwa, the GOP candidate for NYC mayor—to protest how Democrats had “abused their power” during Covid with school lockdowns, and vaccine and mask mandates for kids.
In 2022, she voted for Republican Lee Zeldin for New York governor, and she even switched her party registration from Democrat to Republican “in the hopes of getting a more centrist candidate” in the midterm primaries that year.
Although until recently she had been firmly in the RFK Jr. camp, she said she would consider voting for Trump because “I feel the need to send a message to the Democrats that their dirty politics will not be rewarded.”
With Trump facing a fine, probation, or four years in prison for each of the 34 counts he’s been convicted of, “I’m definitely going to be paying close attention to the response to this case over the next few months,” she said.
“I’m no fan of Trump. That said, I have a huge problem with contorting the law or using prosecutorial authority in the name of ‘saving democracy,’ which has been the Democrats’ message for the past four years.”
“I still consider myself a liberal,” she added. “I just don’t think Biden Democrats reflect what that used to mean.”
Jack MacGuire: “I’m all in with the MAGA people, because this has to end.”
MacGuire, 48, a travel consultant in Houston, Texas, “couldn’t stand Trump” so much that he actually changed his voter registration from Republican to independent in 2016. He voted for Hillary Clinton that year, who he picked because he felt she would bring “continuity and competence” to the country and because she was “the lesser of two evils.” In 2020, MacGuire didn’t vote at all because he felt “disillusioned.”
“I felt Biden lacked the mental competency and physical stamina to be president, and Trump lacked humility and clarity,” he said.
But Trump’s conviction has been a wake-up call, said MacGuire, a married father of two kids. “What happened has every level of corruption and deceit and a willingness to use whatever means necessary to stay in power. It just absolutely galvanized me to say enough is enough. I’m all in with the MAGA people, because this has to end.”
Emery Barter: “Trump doesn’t scare me.”
Barter, 40, a guitar instructor and recording engineer in Oakland, California, is a lifelong Democrat, having canvassed for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and cast his ballot for Biden last time around. But he started questioning his allegiance to the Democratic Party when he said “hyper-progressive policies” encouraged by left-wing District Attorney Pamela Price—including defunding the city’s police force—actually led to a crime wave in Oakland. “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” he said, has made people blind to threats within their own camps. The last five years have also made him question the media narrative on various issues.
“I used to trust the media, but now I feel the media has drifted away from reporting the truth. I just feel everything is completely made up,” he told The Free Press.
Barter, who is engaged to be married, added that Trump “doesn’t scare” him.
“The idea that this one man is the scariest thing when really, I’ve seen many other things to be concerned with,” he said. “The narrative is just worn out.”
Barter added that he’s voting for Trump because he can’t allow a jury of twelve to decide an election outcome for the entire country. “This can’t be the way it’s determined. The idea that this threat to democracy is so great that we must sacrifice democracy to stop this threat through lawfare—it’s an all-consuming idea that can’t be rewarded.”
He concluded: “If you don’t pay attention and you just check the bluest box, you end up voting for people that aren’t actually interested in carrying out their core function anymore.”
Adam Mortara: “It’s a danger to America if Joe Biden wins the election.”
Back in 2016, Mortara, a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, was more of a Rubio or Cruz guy. “I thought Trump was a wild card, not all that conservative,” said Mortara, 49, who lives in Nashville, Tennessee, with his family. During Trump’s term, he found himself “pretty pleased” with the then-president’s isolationist politics and economic performance, but even so, in 2020, he decided not to vote because he felt his vote wouldn’t matter. Now, he tells The Free Press, the recent verdict has pushed him to not just vote for Trump this November, but to donate $3,300 to his campaign.
“What’s gotten me off the sidelines is that if he does not win, and by a rather sizable margin, that will validate this type of weaponization of the judicial system in the future,” Mortara said.
He hopes that if Trump wins, it will have a “deterrent effect” against what he called “politically motivated and targeted and retributive prosecutions of high-ranking political officials.”
“Before, I would’ve said it’s not a danger to America if Joe Biden wins the election.” He paused, as if mulling the gravity of his next words, which he said one by one, slowly: “Now, I kind of think it is.”
Daniel Kotzin: “I don’t want better experts. I want no experts.”
Kotzin, 54, lives in Denver, Colorado, with his wife Jennifer Sey, the former brand president at Levi Strauss, and their two kids. A stay-at-home dad and a former attorney, he’s a lifelong Democrat who voted for Obama twice and also worked for his campaign. In 2016, he also voted for Hillary Clinton. But during the pandemic, he became adamantly opposed to the lockdowns and considered voting for Trump in 2020, but instead went with the Libertarian Party due to the then-president’s vaccine push. But after the verdict came through Thursday, he has no doubt: he’ll be voting for Trump come November.
He said “the persecution of Trump is what decided for me because it made me think that perhaps he is different. He is going to put some dirt in the gears. They hate him too much. It really literally is because they’re pursuing him so aggressively and relentlessly that I want to support him. And I can’t be the only one. It’s too much.”
He said the justice system is being “weaponized” to go after Trump—and he’s worried about what that means for America. “It’s frightening because he’s obviously a very powerful and well-connected person. If they’re able to go after him, any time any of us could have the rug pulled out from under us and have our lives taken away. I don’t want to live in a world like that.”
Even so, he hates that this is his only choice, and said “the average American cannot believe” they have to pick between Biden and Trump. “They don’t want either of these people. I cannot believe that we have these elders. They’re too old. And it’s horrifying to have these options. The average American in both parties feels very helpless. Like there are forces beyond our control.”
But, he added, “the moment you start supporting one, you forget how much you despise both of them, and you start seeing the positives of your person. That’s what I’m doing now. I definitely want Trump to win. I think it’s much better. Trump is almost like a child having a temper tantrum. But that’s what we need right now. That’s our best option.
“I never really changed my view of him. We need a clown, we need a joker. Like during the eclipse a few years ago, the experts said, ‘Don’t look at the sun and if you look at the sun, you’ll go blind.’ And he just looked at it anyway. And they showed pictures, and of course, he’s not blind. That’s what we need. We need an idiot that looks at the sun when the experts say not to. Not forever. Right now. For the next four years. That’s what we need.”
“I don’t want a Democrat right now,” he continued. “I don’t want to be ruled by experts. I don’t want better experts. I want no experts. Trump is just going to try and break stuff, and not listen to anything that anyone tells him to do. And I don’t think that’s necessarily a long-term solution. That’s just what we need right now.”
Eric Brakey: “Democrats don’t preserve democracy.”
Brakey, 35, is a state senator in Maine who calls himself a “Ron Paul Republican” and has voted for the Libertarian candidate in both of the last presidential elections. Until Trump’s conviction, he says he was “undecided,” flirting with a vote for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. this November. But after a colleague blurted out news of the verdict in the middle of a conference call, he said it hit him that “a clear principle” was at stake: “The principle is that the people get to choose our president.”
On Friday morning, he donated to Trump’s campaign.
On the campaign trail, Biden has often warned voters that “democracy is on the line.” But Brakey told The Free Press that the recent verdict is “a very blatant attack on democracy itself.”
“Democrats don’t preserve democracy,” said Brakey. “They’re afraid that the people, when presented a democratic choice, will not vote for them.”
He added: “Democracy is when the people decide.”
Olivia Reingold, Francesca Block, and Rupa Subramanya are reporters for The Free Press. Read Peter Savodnik’s piece on the 2024 election, “The Great Scramble.”
To support more of our work, become a Free Press subscriber today:
There is something odd, really odd, about the level of hatred for Trump. It goes back to 2016. It has never made any sense to me the DEGREE of hatred for him, the intensity of it. Granted, he is not a guy that is particularly likable. Yes, he is a pig, but we have had Bill Clinton, Lyndon Johnson and other presidents that were pigs. Yes, he is arrogant. What president have we had that wasn't arrogant? In a lot of ways there is nothing unique about Trump's behavior or attitudes except perhaps the complete disregard for others opinions.
So why? Why is this man in particular so threatening? Who is he threatening that he needs to be destroyed and his voters with him?
It cannot generally be policy because his policies have always polled better than he does.
I have to conclude that it is because he is a threat to someone or some group with a lot of power. But who?
Who did his policies threaten?
He came out against free trade, believes in managed trade, promised tariffs and to renegotiate NAFTA, both of which he did. So, he was clearly a threat to those with vested interests in offshoring work.
He came out hard against illegal immigration and for limited legal immigration. He slammed the border shut and started to go after the H1B and other programs. Who did this threaten? It threatened the businesses that are dependent on cheap labor.
He called China a threat both economically and geopolitically at a time when the foreign policy establishment, congress and American business were coddling up to it. Remember the calls of him being a racist but yet now everyone sees it.
In short, he attacked the entire neoliberal business model loved by Wall Street, Silicon Valley and most of DC.
He was against more foreign intervention and was the first president in my memory to not involve us in another conflict overseas. He wanted to bring the troops home and have to pull back on our military presence around the world. He wanted NATO members to start paying for their defense and to meet their obligations. Who did this threaten?
It clearly threatened the defense manufacturers. It was a threat to the Foreign Policy establishment and to the power and influence of the Pentagon. It was a threat to the livelihoods of all the above. All those experts with government grants and contracts. All those military officers who want jobs in the defense sector after they retire. It was likely a threat to the same folks at the CIA and NSA.
Worse, he actually succeeded by going AGAINST the experts with things like the Abraham Accords. He was laughed at and mocked for telling the Germans and other Europeans that they were putting themselves at risk by becoming dependent on Russian oil and gas. Well, he was right.
He was clearly a threat to the established order in DC. He came out of nowhere, had not come up through the system of either party and his policies were not the policies, largely, of the Washington consensus. He was wealthy and could not be bought or controlled with money. He was not the usual politician, member of congress, that came to office average and leaves wealthy such as Nancy Pelosi or Hillary Clinton. His kids and relatives did not need jobs or business deals to get rich. In short, he was a threat to the political order and how it runs which is on financial influence. He was a threat to the donor class of both parties and to the power of the leadership of both parties.
He was clearly a threat to all those who want to see a more globalized order with powerful international institutions and nations giving up some of their sovereignty to create them. The TPP which Obama and Hillary were pushing did exactly that. But who would control those powerful institutions? Given the state of the world, the UN and the EU, Trump appears to have been prescient only he was not because many, if not most Americans, saw the threat of that. He just vocalized their concerns.
He was a threat to the social culture being imposed on the rest of the country by a group of liberal elites. In 2016 he violated every rule of political correctness and did it in a way and without fear that most American's wanted to see and wished they could. He challenged the norms being shoved down our throats by college professors, Hollywood and the Manhatten elites and he did it gleefully. And that was before "WOKE" took off. He is defiantly patriotic and pro-America which offends a liberal elite that finds that boorish and ignorant, that prefers to wallow in the sins and failures of the country.
He refused to stay in bounds with the expected party norms. He is a republican that believes in gay marriage. He is more than happy to speak to and with minority crowds. He is a republican that will not come out swinging on making abortion illegal even if he thinks it should be a state issue. He brought the middle and working class to the republican party angering both the old republican establishment and the democrats who take their votes for granted. Yet here we are today with the democrats having become a party of the "elite" and the working and middle class becoming republican constituencies, with a republican party that has more women and more minorities and more candidates of both.
I am convinced that the "resistance" and the two impeachments and now the lawfare, are all just efforts by powerful groups to maintain their power and their access to wealth and influence.
on 4/19/24, Joe Biden rewrote a 52 year old civil rights law that protected women to include men. This law changes the legal status of women to include gender. This means men will be allowed in every female space, including bathrooms, prisons, locker rooms, rape centers etc. for women etc. It will mandate pronouns, and anyone that speaks otherwise could be charged with, "sexual harassment." "Woman" is no longer a protected sex class, but an abstract concept of interchangeable parts, that anyone can participate in. If Trump rewrote a historic civil rights law on his own, without the input of congress or voters, they'd call him a dictator. I'd vote for a convicted felon over the authoritarian death cult anyway. We the people will have the last word.The Democratic Party is a threat to democracy.