Mark Pincus: Biden Is Even Riskier Than Trump


Illustration by The Free Press, images via Getty.

EXCLUSIVE: Public Schoolers Are Paid $1,400 a Pop to Become Social Justice Warriors

Cash for kids to attend social justice seminars. Plus: Listen now to the first episode of our audio documentary, ‘The Free Press in Israel.’

Today from The Free Press: The first episode of our Israel audio documentary; how to attend our next debate; why Dune: Part Two won’t save Hollywood; and ten stories we’re reading. 

But first, another scoop from Free Press reporter Francesca Block. (Or “Frannie Blockbuster,” as we now refer to her at TFP HQ.) 

An activist group in California has paid public high schoolers $1,400 each to learn how to fight for social and racial justice. And the money for the scheme comes from the state’s taxpayers.

Californians for Justice, which promotes itself as a “statewide youth-powered organization fighting for racial justice,” struck a deal with the Long Beach Unified School District to run after-school clubs that train teenagers in the way of the social justice warrior. Exactly what the kids learn in the sessions isn’t clear, but one teenage participant was refreshingly honest in explaining why other kids should sign up: “You get paid good.” 

Teachers and parents interviewed by The Free Press call the scheme a “horrible propaganda strategy.” 

One teacher in the district told Francesca that a scheme designed to help children find their voice is having the opposite effect. “One of the reasons that they were hired is to help our students find their voice and be able to express it,” said Jay Goldfischer, a high school history teacher. “But in reality, CFJ is not helping students find their own voices. It’s giving them a scripted voice that’s not their own.” 

“They’re teaching them parroting,” he added, “which is the exact opposite of how you empower children.”

Read Francesca’s full investigation here: 

Come to Our Next Live Debate!

Ah, presidential debates. A crucial pillar of our democracy. A chance for Americans to hear soaring rhetoric from the people vying to lead this country and the free world on the issues that matter. . .  

If only! Yes, if you couldn’t tell from my tone, we at The Free Press think presidential debates have become a bit of a joke. Which is why—in case you missed our announcement yesterday—we’re doing some counterprogramming of our own with a new series of live events: The America Debates

We’re kicking things off in Dallas on April 11, where the question up for discussion will be: Should America Shut Its Borders?  

Ann Coulter and Sohrab Ahmari will face off against Nick Gillespie and Cenk Uygur, with Bari moderating. You won’t want to miss it. (Did we mention there’s an after-party?) 

The presale is open to paid subscribers now (for details on how to get early access, click here) and tickets will go on sale for everyone else at 11 a.m. ET today. Get ’em while they’re hot! 

Ten Stories We’re Reading 

  1. The White House is betting on bad polls. Nate Silver thinks that’s risky. (Silver Bulletin)

  2. Mitch McConnell has endorsed Donald Trump. (CNN)

  3. Nikki Haley has not. (AP)

  4. A movie about a fictional civil war has some worried about an actual civil war—which is presumably the whole point. (Hollywood Reporter)

  5. After reports of a meeting with Donald Trump, Elon Musk says he is not donating to “either candidate for U.S. president.” (X)

  6. Just 27 percent of Americans think the country is as respected throughout the world as it was three years ago. Remember “America is back”? (Gallup)

  7. But Pax Americana is more robust than it looks, argues Walter Russell Mead. (WSJ)

  8. New York governor Kathy Hochul plans to deploy the National Guard on New York’s subway system to check bags and patrol platforms. Or, as Tom Cotton put it on X, “send[ing] in the troops to restore law and order.” (NYT)

  9. Brown will reinstate standardized testing. It is the third Ivy, joining Dartmouth and Yale, to have done so this year. Six months from now, the rest will have signed on and the whole thing will be memory-holed like the rest of 2020. (Brown Daily Herald)

  10. A UK court is weighing a juicy question: Who created crypto? (Axios)

Listen: Episode One of Our New Audio Documentary on Israel at War Is Out Now 

Earlier this week, Honestly executive producer Candace Mittel Kahn wrote about why she, Bari, and a whole team from The Free Press went to Israel earlier this year. 

“Months after Hamas invaded the country,” Candace wrote, “I knew that Israel was gone. What I would find in its place, I didn’t know. But I went. I went because I wanted to know.”

As Candace went on to explain, she arrived back home from that trip with 30 hours of tape. “I got to work putting together the story of a people in mourning, a country at war, and a nation on the frontlines of a civilizational fight.” 

The first chapter in that story, “Running Toward Fire,” is out today. 

Click here to listen: 

Timothée Chalamet, left, and Austin Butler in Dune: Part Two

Can Dune: Part Two Save Hollywood? 

Hollywood is in trouble. Yes, Barbie and Oppenheimer brought in record profits, and a wave of industrial action in Tinseltown has finally passed. But streaming, AI, dwindling attention spans, and aging stars mean movie execs are nervous. Enter Dune: Part Two, which opened Friday—the film many executives hope will put their industry back in business. The sci-fi blockbuster delivered in its opening weekend, bringing in $81.5 million at the box office. But does the movie itself live up to the hype? And is Timothée Chalamet really the next Tom Cruise? We sent Suzy Weiss out to Arrakis (okay, a theater in Brooklyn), to investigate. Here’s her verdict:

Dune: Part Two is a feast for the eyes. The special effects are amazing, the shots are majestic, but a launching pad for New Hollywood it is not. Let me explain why. 

The sequel sees the hero, Paul Atriedes, played by Timothée Chalamet, battle alongside—and win the respect of—the Fremen, an indigenous desert people. Zendaya, a Fremen, plays Chani, the reluctant, then devoted, love interest. And a third young star, Austin Butler, is the murderous, psychopathic, and “sexually vulnerable” villain prince, Feyd-Rautha.

These three A-listers—Butler, who exploded onto the scene in Baz Luhrmann’s Elvis, Chalamet, and Zendaya—are meant to replace Studio City’s aging fleet: Cruise, Kidman, Pitt, DiCaprio. All three young stars are the subject of breathless coverage, for their critically acclaimed acting, carefully appointed outfits, and relationships with other stars. Each is the face of a luxury perfume. All three of them have appeared on the Disney Channel. 

And it shows. 

They are all clean and corporatized. Brand safe. There’s barely anything to hold on to with these young actors, which makes the experience of watching them less exciting. There’s no promise of an on-screen romance tearing up a real-life marriage (looking at you, Mr. and Mrs. Smith). I can’t imagine any of them jumping up and down on Oprah’s couch, or even sharing an outlandish political opinion, let alone anything having to do with a gerbil

Studio City has been shoving Timothée Chalamet down our throats as everyone from Willy Wonka to King Henry V to, soon, Bob Dylan. God help us. Chalamet was well-cast in Call Me by Your Name and Ladybird, movies where he plays an affected teen, but Dylan? Henry V? He’s going to have to show us some real-life verve to be believable in the heavier roles. 

In Dune, predictably, Chalamet’s Paul is pretty, but he’s not fearsome. Feyd-Rautha is a young Voldemort, if you’re into that sort of thing. Chalamet and Zendaya’s boyish bodies look oddly similar. I had fun at the movie, but I felt like I was watching action figures hit their marks, not a new crop of shiny young things steering the movie industry out of choppy waters.

Oliver Wiseman is a writer and editor at The Free Press. Follow him on X @ollywiseman

And become a Free Press subscriber today: 

Subscribe now

our Comments

Use common sense here: disagree, debate, but don't be a .

the fp logo
comment bg

Welcome to The FP Community!

Our comments are an editorial product for our readers to have smart, thoughtful conversations and debates — the sort we need more of in America today. The sort of debate we love.   

We have standards in our comments section just as we do in our journalism. If you’re being a jerk, we might delete that one. And if you’re being a jerk for a long time, we might remove you from the comments section. 

Common Sense was our original name, so please use some when posting. Here are some guidelines:

  • We have a simple rule for all Free Press staff: act online the way you act in real life. We think that’s a good rule for everyone.
  • We drop an occasional F-bomb ourselves, but try to keep your profanities in check. We’re proud to have Free Press readers of every age, and we want to model good behavior for them. (Hello to Intern Julia!)
  • Speaking of obscenities, don’t hurl them at each other. Harassment, threats, and derogatory comments that derail productive conversation are a hard no.
  • Criticizing and wrestling with what you read here is great. Our rule of thumb is that smart people debate ideas, dumb people debate identity. So keep it classy. 
  • Don’t spam, solicit, or advertise here. Submit your recommendations to if you really think our audience needs to hear about it.
Close Guidelines