The Free Press
NewslettersSign InSubscribe

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
Will You Be a Dancing Monkey in the Age of AI?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Will You Be a Dancing Monkey in the Age of AI?
The big AI question is not whether it will make us feel stupid. It is whether it will make us more competent in managing the lunatic carnival that is modern life.
By Martin Gurri
06.04.25 — Culture and Ideas
AI will be a species-altering event. The question “What does it mean to be human in an age of superintelligent machines?” will reverberate like an echo deep into the future. (Illustration by The Free Press)
--:--
--:--
Upgrade to Listen
5 mins
Produced by ElevenLabs using AI narration
101
92

Share this post

The Free Press
The Free Press
Will You Be a Dancing Monkey in the Age of AI?
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Tyler Cowen is usually the smartest person in the room. I consider him a friend, so I’ve often been in the room with him, and when he speaks, on any number of subjects, there tends to be a pause in the conversation as people reach for their notepads.

With Avital Balwit, Cowen recently co-wrote a fascinating article, published by The Free Press, on the many ways the arrival of artificial intelligence will reconfigure our basic humanity. I don’t know Balwit personally, but she tells us that at 26 she holds an important position at Anthropic, the company responsible for an AI large language model called Claude. So I suspect that she, too, is extraordinarily smart.

So here we have two extremely intelligent humans confronting the reality of transcendentally intelligent machines—and while the vision of the future they describe in their article very much leans on the side of optimism, their gut reaction is to feel diminished. AI, they tell us, will trigger “the most profound identity crisis humanity has ever faced.” The reason? AI spells the end of “human intellectual supremacy—a position we’ve held unchallenged for our entire existence.” That is, people who once thought of themselves as the pinnacle of brainpower will now struggle “to live meaningful lives in a world where they are no longer the smartest and most capable entities in it.”

My initial reflection on reading this was, Whew, could be a lot worse . . . I’m a baby boomer. The big, scary invention in my youth was the nuclear bomb, which threatened to cause the end of human existence, rather than just existential anguish. Those who survived being pulverized would be eaten by 40-foot mutated insects, Hollywood reliably informed us.

Then, when considering the matter further, I found the claim that humanity has always seen itself as the smartest thing on the planet to be curiously ahistorical. Most people to this day believe in greater powers and a higher intelligence. “The heavens proclaim the glory of God,” said the psalmist. Cosmic arrogance—what the ancient Greeks called hubris—has long been understood to lead to self-destruction. AI models like Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT will eventually absorb all human knowledge, wisdom, and madness and then interface with us as a person or at least a personality. Thus, we are likely to approach them as the ancient Greeks once approached the oracle of Apollo at Delphi—whose prophecies were often too clever by half.

Enjoying the story?
Enter your email to read this article and receive our daily newsletter.
Already have an account?
Sign In
Martin Gurri

Martin Gurri is a former CIA analyst and author of The Revolt of the Public. He is currently a Visiting Research Fellow at Mercatus Center; his essays have appeared in Discourse, City Journal, and UnHerd, among other publications.

Tags:
Technology
Ideas
Culture
Comments
Join the conversation
Share your thoughts and connect with other readers by becoming a paid subscriber!
Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
More in Technology
For Free People.
LatestSearchAboutCareersShopPodcastsVideoEvents
©2025 The Free Press. All Rights Reserved.Powered by Substack.
Privacy∙Terms∙Collection notice

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More