Comments
127
Commenting has been turned off for this post
Jason's avatar

I actually will miss the body positivity thing, it'll be sad when everyone looks the same.

Expand full comment
None's avatar

Please, please TFP, could you put some kind of “bookmark” in your programming? Whenever I read an article and have to stop for a moment, when I try to go back to finish it, TFP opens it exactly where I left off. I appreciate that. Could you please do that also for comments? When I start reading comments and stop for a second or two for RL issues, it takes me forever to figure out where I left off. I have to scroll and scroll and reread..and even when I’m interested I sometimes just say. “Forget it.”

Please add an optional bookmark for comments. Pretty please.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

Drolly humorous to assign Will Rahn and Sam Tanenhaus to write about Conservatism. It would have been much less pretentious to just have them write about Orange Man Bad.

Expand full comment
Shane Gericke's avatar

Be cool if Bar commissioned a story headlined "Why I left the Trump cult and joined the Democratic Party" to counter the many variations of "Why I dumped the Democrats for the GOP" stories like today's.

Expand full comment
JD Free's avatar

The online Left passes an incredible number of absurd fabrications around as though they're plausible, and one of them is a hundred variations on "I voted for Trump and I regret it", but over here in the land of "things have to actually be true before we believe them", we can't find a single real person with that story.

Expand full comment
Robert Lee's avatar

Ha! Ha!

So true

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar

There needs to be at least a veneer of plausibility.

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

We are in multiple bubbles: a real estate bubble, a stock market bubble, and probably a crypto bubble.

I would maintain that a crash of any of these bubbles (is that a mixed metaphor?) would be a buying opportunity, as the author pointed out with reference to Amazon in 2001.

Expand full comment
Shane Gericke's avatar

They would be buying opportunities only if their crash(es) didn't take down the general economy. Those sectors are so huge right now that crashing them might spark another Depression.

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

There are so many checks and balances in place that most likely a crash in any particular sector would be followed by a pretty quick recovery. There are a lot of people with a lot of money in the U.S., e.g. the Boomer generation, and they will just snap up any stocks and properties that look like bargains. This isn't their first rodeo.

Expand full comment
frank tarascio's avatar

Have read both Cowen's and Ferguson's AI stories. Very good. Thank you TFP. Wondering if Cowen's "Historically, in the normal course of events, all of the gains in the S&P 500 come from less than four percent of the available stocks." is accurate. I've not come across that.

Tariff checks = shitty idea

The United Nations ...approved a resolution to deploy an “international stabilization force” to disarm Hamas = broken clock

Expand full comment
MMP's avatar

I agree re: the tariff checks. It's pandering. Let the economic decisions made by the Trump admin play out as it has only been 10 months. Good grief, he is cleaning up Biden's economic mess. Personally, I have noted that gas prices are down (at least in the states where I buy gas. Likely not the case in California but that is due to their insane environmental regulations), I note that grocery prices remain static. Some items are up, some are down. Housing affordability is not a problem this administration created.

Expand full comment
John Boy West's avatar

Pandering is the name of the game for Dems — kickbacks for greenie donors, SNAP for 42 million in the richest country in the world. Why not use our shortlived power to buy some votes? The Dems have 20 million new voters and we’ve exported 250,000 x 4 years — do the math.

Expand full comment
Terry's avatar

Tariff checks are effectively vote buying scheme in advance of the 2026 elections. The Republicans are trying not to lose the Congress. Of course, the Democrats will try to delay the vote until after the elections.

Expand full comment
frank tarascio's avatar

Exactly. Absolve college debt anyone?

Expand full comment
Guy Higgins's avatar

"Niall Ferguson issued a warning: The AI boom, he wrote, “is a house of cards.”" Before I accept that, I would like to recommend that Mr. Ferguson read Professor Carlota Perezʻs book Technological Revolutions. The Dot Com bubble led to where we are now, and while much of the AI "bubble" is likely to burst, it can very well lead us to a much more productive economy. BUT, just like people had to learn how to use computers, people have to learn how to use AI.

Expand full comment
TxFrog's avatar

Fareed Zakaria has a point: affordability is a problem mostly in places governed by Democrats:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/11/17/fareed_zakaria_if_america_has_an_affordability_crisis_it_tends_to_be_in_places_democrats_govern.html

Expand full comment
Shane Gericke's avatar

Since the housing crunches are primarily in places where the jobs are, then you have to credit Democrats for providing all those jobs. You don't get high housing prices without high numbers of jobs.

Expand full comment
TxFrog's avatar

So Ukraine is signing 10-year deals to buy weapons from European countries. At least that gives the Europeans incentive to see that there is still a Ukraine in 10 years.

Expand full comment
Joseph Harari's avatar

Surprised with a UN resolution not condemning Israel, for once in the past 30 years, BUT there hasn’t been one example of a multi-national UN force able to keep the peace, ie control/eliminate Arab terrorists. This idea sounds like the sham of Dems giving Iran billions for peaceful nuclear development. We’ve been down this road before? The murderers of the massacre need to be killed or brought to justice, like Nuremberg.

Expand full comment
Scott A Miller's avatar

The UN Security Council measure should have been the lead story today. To get anti-Zionist/antisemitic UN to agree to disarm Hamas is one of the greatest triumphs of Trumps' 2nd administration.

Expand full comment
William Bilek's avatar

" to agree to disarm Hamas"

Don't count your chickens before they hatch.

Expand full comment
Herodotus II's avatar

Who is today's front page editor, "Rick Brooks"? Have we already been introduced? I don't recall...

Expand full comment
Herodotus II's avatar

Robert P. George, Board of Heritage... "The public intellectual" -- LOL! I guess most of us are private. You can get arrested for that, ya know...

Expand full comment
Herodotus II's avatar

Re: David Richardson, former head of FEMA -- I googled "David Richardson Guadalupe floods" -- and got not ONE outlet that was conservative or right-leaning. WAPO, MSNBC, Politico, The Guardian, Daily Beast, Mother Jones... the list goes on, with no conservative outlet in sight.

Then I googled "Were there ANY right-leaning newspapers' or outlets' reporting done on Guadalupe floods?" Answer: "Yes, there were. They sought to defend the Trump administration." BUT THEY DID NOT SAY WHO THEY WERE! I finally got ONE by asking point-blank "Did FOX report on the Guadalupe floods?"

Remember "Gemini", Google's 1st AI rollout, where Nazis were black and Founding Fathers BIPOC? Yeah, it's still them...

Expand full comment
Harry Jessell's avatar

"rocked the internet." Calm down Suzy or we'll have to get you a job at the NY Post.

Expand full comment
Herodotus II's avatar

Actually, not a bad gig. Douglas Murray has a column there...

Expand full comment
Harry Jessell's avatar

Point is, the paper is famous for its hyperbole.

Expand full comment
Scottrj's avatar

At least the hyperbole is in plain sight, unlike, say, NYT. Plus the

Post is fun to read.

Expand full comment
Harry Jessell's avatar

Its 1983 headline -- "Headless Body in Topless Bar" -- is a classic.

Expand full comment
Herodotus II's avatar

"the state of the right—from the Groypers to MTG". Yep, that does seem to be the wide spectrum TFP sees of the GOP, doesn't it...

Expand full comment